Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia · 2019
Pharmacokinetics of midazolam in sevoflurane-anesthetized cats.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dholakia Urshulaa, Seddighi Reza, Cox Sherry K, Sun Xiaocun, Pypendop Bruno H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the pharmacokinetics of midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam after midazolam administration as an intravenous bolus in sevoflurane-anesthetized cats.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective pharmacokinetic study.
ANIMALS: A group of six healthy adult, female domestic cats.
METHODS: Anesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane. After 30 minutes of anesthetic equilibration, cats were administered midazolam (0.3 mg kg-1) over 15 seconds. Venous blood was collected at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 30, 45, 90, 180 and 360 minutes after administration. Plasma concentrations for midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam were measured using high-pressure liquid chromatography. The heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR), rectal temperature, noninvasive mean arterial pressure (MAP) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (Pe'CO2) were recorded at 5 minute intervals. Population compartment models were fitted to the time-plasma midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam concentrations using nonlinear mixed effect modeling.
RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic model was fitted to the data from five cats, as 1-hydroxymidazolam was not detected in one cat. A five-compartment model best fitted the data. Typical values (% interindividual variability where estimated) for the volumes of distribution for midazolam (three compartments) and hydroxymidazolam (two compartments) were 117 (14), 286 (10), 705 (14), 53 (36) and 334 mL kg-1, respectively. Midazolam clearance to 1-hydroxymidazolam, midazolam fast and slow intercompartmental clearances, 1-hydroxymidazolam clearance and 1-hydroxymidazolam intercompartment clearance were 18.3, 63.5 (15), 22.1 (8), 1.7 (67) and 3.8 mL minute-1 kg-1, respectively. No significant changes in HR, MAP, fR or Pe'CO2 were observed following midazolam administration.
CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In sevoflurane-anesthetized cats, a five-compartment model best fitted the midazolam pharamacokinetic profile. There was a high interindividual variability in the plasma 1-hydroxymidazolam concentrations, and this metabolite had a low clearance and persisted in the plasma for longer than the parent drug. Midazolam administration did not result in clinically significant changes in physiologic variables.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective pharmacokinetic study.
ANIMALS: A group of six healthy adult, female domestic cats.
METHODS: Anesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane. After 30 minutes of anesthetic equilibration, cats were administered midazolam (0.3 mg kg-1) over 15 seconds. Venous blood was collected at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 15, 30, 45, 90, 180 and 360 minutes after administration. Plasma concentrations for midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam were measured using high-pressure liquid chromatography. The heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (fR), rectal temperature, noninvasive mean arterial pressure (MAP) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (Pe'CO2) were recorded at 5 minute intervals. Population compartment models were fitted to the time-plasma midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam concentrations using nonlinear mixed effect modeling.
RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic model was fitted to the data from five cats, as 1-hydroxymidazolam was not detected in one cat. A five-compartment model best fitted the data. Typical values (% interindividual variability where estimated) for the volumes of distribution for midazolam (three compartments) and hydroxymidazolam (two compartments) were 117 (14), 286 (10), 705 (14), 53 (36) and 334 mL kg-1, respectively. Midazolam clearance to 1-hydroxymidazolam, midazolam fast and slow intercompartmental clearances, 1-hydroxymidazolam clearance and 1-hydroxymidazolam intercompartment clearance were 18.3, 63.5 (15), 22.1 (8), 1.7 (67) and 3.8 mL minute-1 kg-1, respectively. No significant changes in HR, MAP, fR or Pe'CO2 were observed following midazolam administration.
CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In sevoflurane-anesthetized cats, a five-compartment model best fitted the midazolam pharamacokinetic profile. There was a high interindividual variability in the plasma 1-hydroxymidazolam concentrations, and this metabolite had a low clearance and persisted in the plasma for longer than the parent drug. Midazolam administration did not result in clinically significant changes in physiologic variables.