Radiography (London, England : 1995) · 2025
Exploring the lived experiences of diagnostic radiographers after transitioning to non-emergency imaging settings.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ngo M, Thorburn K, Naama A, Skelton E
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The demand for diagnostic imaging in emergency clinical settings has increased in recent years, placing pressure on the available workforce. However, challenges including staff shortages and inflexible shift patterns may prompt radiographers to leave emergency settings. This study explores the lived experiences of radiographers who have transitioned to non-emergency settings and factors that might influence their decision to return.
METHODS: A descriptive phenomenological approach was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 diagnostic radiographers working in the UK, who had transitioned to non-emergency settings within the last one to five years.
RESULTS: Participants provided insight into (1) the past: reasons for transitioning, (2) the present: current thoughts on wellbeing and professional development, and (3) the future: possibility of returning to the emergency setting. Occupational pressures including excessive workloads, physical exhaustion, and time constraints leading to moral distress, were commonly cited reasons for transitioning to non-emergency setting. Since transitioning, participants reported improvement in their physical and mental well-being, renewed job satisfaction, and enhanced work-life balance. Career advancement opportunities, a better work environment, competitive salaries, and improved mental health support, could encourage a return to the emergency setting.
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the valuable learning experiences that emergency settings offer diagnostic radiographers, greatly enhancing their skills and overall competence. However, challenging work conditions can lead to job dissatisfaction and burn out. Instead of leaving the profession altogether, some radiographers found renewed satisfaction by transitioning to non-emergency settings. The majority of participants would consider returning to emergency imaging under the right conditions.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Flexibility regarding work arrangements, career advancement opportunities, competitive salary offers, and improved mental health support through interventions such as debriefing, could help retain radiographers in emergency settings.
METHODS: A descriptive phenomenological approach was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 diagnostic radiographers working in the UK, who had transitioned to non-emergency settings within the last one to five years.
RESULTS: Participants provided insight into (1) the past: reasons for transitioning, (2) the present: current thoughts on wellbeing and professional development, and (3) the future: possibility of returning to the emergency setting. Occupational pressures including excessive workloads, physical exhaustion, and time constraints leading to moral distress, were commonly cited reasons for transitioning to non-emergency setting. Since transitioning, participants reported improvement in their physical and mental well-being, renewed job satisfaction, and enhanced work-life balance. Career advancement opportunities, a better work environment, competitive salaries, and improved mental health support, could encourage a return to the emergency setting.
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the valuable learning experiences that emergency settings offer diagnostic radiographers, greatly enhancing their skills and overall competence. However, challenging work conditions can lead to job dissatisfaction and burn out. Instead of leaving the profession altogether, some radiographers found renewed satisfaction by transitioning to non-emergency settings. The majority of participants would consider returning to emergency imaging under the right conditions.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Flexibility regarding work arrangements, career advancement opportunities, competitive salary offers, and improved mental health support through interventions such as debriefing, could help retain radiographers in emergency settings.