MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.semerg.2014.02.008

Медицинская библиотека · Semergen · 2014

[Burnout syndrome in general practitioners of Avila].

Frutos-Llanes R, Jiménez-Blanco S, Blanco-Montagut L E

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine the level of burnout in general practitioners of Avila and the influence of social, occupational and health factors.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional epidemiological study was conducted and aimed at all Primary Care medical staff of Avila during the first half of 2011, using two questionnaires: the Maslach Burnout Inventory and other sociodemographic, health and occupational variables.

RESULTS

A response rate of 51.8% was obtained. The mean age was 48.55±8.16, and 52% were male, 77% married, 45% with tenure, 78% worked in rural centres, and, 82% performed out of hours home visits plus clinics. The prevalence of severe burn out was low (16%) in our study was low. A high prevalence (68%) of moderate/severe level of the condition was found. Being married (P=.012), do not guards (P<.0001), working in rural areas (P=.008), and to be an area doctor (p=.03), predisposes to suffer burnout in severe or moderate/severe burnout.

CONCLUSIONS

A moderate level of burnout was found. Contrary to what many doctors thought, the prevalence of the condition in its severe form was low, but was high when taking the severe and moderate/severe forms together. Therefore, measures should be extended to reduce occupational stress of doctors, in order to improve working practices and professional efficiency.

Для цитирования: Frutos-Llanes R, Jiménez-Blanco S, Blanco-Montagut L E. [Burnout syndrome in general practitioners of Avila].. Semergen. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.semerg.2014.02.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.