[How is burnout treated? Treatment approaches between wellness, job-related prevention of stress, psychotherapy, and social criticism].

The subjective illness burnout is often described as the combination of workload-related suffering and job dissatisfaction, thus, leading to depressive symptoms. Burnout is a serious model of personal illness perception, but not useful as a diagnosis term because of its lack of specification and reliability. In this respect, burnout therapy cannot be regarded as a specific form of psychotherapy or any other form of therapy, but rather a pragmatic procedure focusing on the burnout clients' needs. When applying scientific standards, the evidence of a more or less specific anti-burnout effect of such procedures involving relaxation, wellness, alternative medical approaches, and psychotherapy are between weak and non-existent. From a conceptual point of view, strategies focusing on relaxation and symptom-reduction can be distinguished from prospective, job-related stress management efforts. In clinical psychotherapeutic settings, aspects of both are usually combined in programs claimed to be integrative or holistic. However, whether these programs really enhance the individual therapeutic outcome has yet to be proved in controlled clinical trials. The efficacy of preventive anti-stress programs and of job-related therapeutic groups, offered complementary to common therapeutic programs in psychosomatic hospitals, have been demonstrated in several studies. Therapeutic information focusing on side effects of social and work-related changes on an individual's psychosomatic wellbeing are needed. The prominent term burnout may be helpful in the public discussion but is not useful in the conceptual framework of a rational, scientific-based procedure in this field.