Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2006
In vivo stress behavior in cemented and screw-retained five-unit implant FPDs.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Karl Matthias, Taylor Thomas D, Wichmann Manfred G, Heckmann Siegfried M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: When fixing implant-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs), it is important to achieve passive fit. The objective of the in vivo study presented was to quantify the strain development during the fixation of screw- and cement-retained FPDs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After informed patient consent had been obtained (Ethics commission Approval No. 2315; FAU Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany), four groups of five-unit FPDs (five samples per group) were fabricated and investigated in vivo. Group 1: Cementable, repositioning technique impression, burn out plastic coping; Group 2: Screwable, pickup technique impression, burn out plastic coping; Group 3: Screwable, pickup technique impression, cast to gold cylinder; Group 4: Screwable, pickup technique impression, bonded to gold cylinder. Two strain gauges (SG) were attached to the pontics of each bridge (SG-M and SG-D) to measure the strains that occurred during either the cementing or screw-in process. The final values were recorded for analysis.
RESULTS: The mean strain values (microm/m) for each SG were: Group 1: SG-M 32 microm/m, SG-D: 89 microm/m; Group 2: SG-M 302 microm/m, SG-D: 197 microm/m; Group 3: SG-M 458 microm/m, SG-D: 268 microm/m; Group 4: SG-M 269 microm/m, SG-D: 52 microm/m.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the bridges were clinically acceptable, none of them revealed a truly passive fit with zero microstrain. In contrast to conventional screw-retained bridges, cement retention seems to result in lower strain levels. Bonding bridge pontics to prefabricated implant components seems to allow both the retrievability of a screw-retained bridge and produce moderate strain values.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After informed patient consent had been obtained (Ethics commission Approval No. 2315; FAU Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany), four groups of five-unit FPDs (five samples per group) were fabricated and investigated in vivo. Group 1: Cementable, repositioning technique impression, burn out plastic coping; Group 2: Screwable, pickup technique impression, burn out plastic coping; Group 3: Screwable, pickup technique impression, cast to gold cylinder; Group 4: Screwable, pickup technique impression, bonded to gold cylinder. Two strain gauges (SG) were attached to the pontics of each bridge (SG-M and SG-D) to measure the strains that occurred during either the cementing or screw-in process. The final values were recorded for analysis.
RESULTS: The mean strain values (microm/m) for each SG were: Group 1: SG-M 32 microm/m, SG-D: 89 microm/m; Group 2: SG-M 302 microm/m, SG-D: 197 microm/m; Group 3: SG-M 458 microm/m, SG-D: 268 microm/m; Group 4: SG-M 269 microm/m, SG-D: 52 microm/m.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the bridges were clinically acceptable, none of them revealed a truly passive fit with zero microstrain. In contrast to conventional screw-retained bridges, cement retention seems to result in lower strain levels. Bonding bridge pontics to prefabricated implant components seems to allow both the retrievability of a screw-retained bridge and produce moderate strain values.