MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.20529/ijme.2026.035

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of medical ethics · 2026

Responsible researchers and reviewers: Ethics of Good Clinical Practice silver jubilee workshop report.

Savitha D, Krishnakumar Mathangi, Pais Prem, Chinnappa Jagdish, Pradeep Johnson, Idiculla Jyothi, Vaz Manjulika, Nisha C K, Rajarathna Kavitha, Angeline Nancy, Joseph Mary, Savio Jayanthi, Kumar Karuna Ramesh

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Ethics education in biomedical research in India is frequently limited to regulatory compliance, with inadequate emphasis on ethical reasoning, contextual vulnerability, and deliberative review processes. As part of the Silver Jubilee of the Institutional Ethics Committee of St John's Medical College Hospital, a one-day preconference workshop titled "Responsible Researchers and Reviewers: Ethics of Good Clinical Practice" was conducted during the 13th International Conference of Ethics Education. The workshop employed case-based, interdisciplinary discussions focusing on vulnerability, ethics committee accreditation, and ethical review of diverse study designs. Key gaps identified included difficulties in operationalising vulnerability, managing surrogate consent in critical care research, inconsistent ethics committee monitoring practices, and limited faculty preparedness for ethics pedagogy. The discussions revealed a need to move beyond knowledge transmission towards reflective, skills-based ethics education.

Для цитирования: Savitha D, Krishnakumar Mathangi, Pais Prem, Chinnappa Jagdish, Pradeep Johnson, Idiculla Jyothi, Vaz Manjulika, Nisha C K, Rajarathna Kavitha, Angeline Nancy, Joseph Mary, Savio Jayanthi, Kumar Karuna Ramesh. Responsible researchers and reviewers: Ethics of Good Clinical Practice silver jubilee workshop report.. Indian journal of medical ethics. 2026. DOI: 10.20529/ijme.2026.035.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.