The International journal of health planning and management · 2026
Determinants of Health Research Evidence Utilization in the Health Planning of Tanzania: Perspectives of Participants From a Qualitative Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kagoma Pius, Mongi Richard, Kalolo Albino
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The utilization of health research evidence is essential for informed decision-making, especially in health planning and achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC). However, limited information exists regarding its use in planning in Lower Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), including Tanzania. This study assessed the use of health research evidence and factors influencing its utilization among health planning teams.
METHODS: A descriptive qualitative approach was used to examine determinants of evidence use in health planning. Data were collected through six focus group discussions and 34 in-depth interviews with planning team members from regional, council, and health facility levels. The COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation) was applied to assess factors influencing evidence use, and thematic analysis was conducted on the transcribed data.
FINDINGS: Although participants reported using available planning guidelines, the incorporation of health research evidence into planning was limited. Capability barriers included inadequate knowledge and skills for evidence-based planning. Opportunities included planning guidelines that supported evidence use, research coordinators, policymaker-researcher interactions, and infrastructure such as computers and the internet; however, access to knowledge translation tools was limited. Motivation was influenced by incentives such as extra duty allowances, promotions, and professional development opportunities.
CONCLUSION: The use of health research evidence in planning processes in Tanzania is low, influenced by capability, opportunity, and motivation factors. Enhancing capacity-building, fostering collaboration, strengthening policy support, and improving infrastructure are recommended. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions and their impact on healthcare planning and delivery. Efforts were made to minimize social desirability and selection biases.
METHODS: A descriptive qualitative approach was used to examine determinants of evidence use in health planning. Data were collected through six focus group discussions and 34 in-depth interviews with planning team members from regional, council, and health facility levels. The COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation) was applied to assess factors influencing evidence use, and thematic analysis was conducted on the transcribed data.
FINDINGS: Although participants reported using available planning guidelines, the incorporation of health research evidence into planning was limited. Capability barriers included inadequate knowledge and skills for evidence-based planning. Opportunities included planning guidelines that supported evidence use, research coordinators, policymaker-researcher interactions, and infrastructure such as computers and the internet; however, access to knowledge translation tools was limited. Motivation was influenced by incentives such as extra duty allowances, promotions, and professional development opportunities.
CONCLUSION: The use of health research evidence in planning processes in Tanzania is low, influenced by capability, opportunity, and motivation factors. Enhancing capacity-building, fostering collaboration, strengthening policy support, and improving infrastructure are recommended. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions and their impact on healthcare planning and delivery. Efforts were made to minimize social desirability and selection biases.