Advances in medical education and practice · 2026
Video-Assisted Simulation with Audience Response (VASAR): An Educationally Efficient and Scalable Model for Medical Education Simulation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gooi Adrian, Fung Kevin, Nguyen Lily H P, Viallet Norbert
Аннотация
PURPOSE: High-fidelity simulation offers invaluable educational benefits in medical education. It provides the opportunity to develop critical communication and crisis resource management skills, but depends upon a high level of resources including technical equipment, a simulated environment, and instructors with expertise in simulation. This study aimed to develop an educational model that provided some of the benefits of simulation but with increased educational efficiency.
METHODS: The intervention was implemented at a specialty continuing medical education conference. This study combined video scenarios, role-playing, team-based learning strategies, and audience response systems to create Video-Assisted Simulation with Audience Response (VASAR). Post-session questionnaire data was compared between traditional high-fidelity simulation and VASAR. Data was also compared to questionnaire responses from separate experiences with high-fidelity simulation.
RESULTS: The study included 70 participants. The data suggest that participants found VASAR to be useful (96%) and realistic (92%). Both video and audience response systems were felt to be valuable (96% and 92%). Participants indicated the workshop would help them practice more safely (80%). In comparison of VASAR with traditional high-fidelity simulation, there were no statistical differences for usefulness of the course (p=0.53), feedback from debriefers (p=0.14), or recommending the course to colleagues (p=0.48).
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that Video-Assisted Simulation with Audience Response can provide an interactive simulated clinical experience which participants find useful to clinical practice, and that VASAR can provide a tool for future strategies in medical education.
METHODS: The intervention was implemented at a specialty continuing medical education conference. This study combined video scenarios, role-playing, team-based learning strategies, and audience response systems to create Video-Assisted Simulation with Audience Response (VASAR). Post-session questionnaire data was compared between traditional high-fidelity simulation and VASAR. Data was also compared to questionnaire responses from separate experiences with high-fidelity simulation.
RESULTS: The study included 70 participants. The data suggest that participants found VASAR to be useful (96%) and realistic (92%). Both video and audience response systems were felt to be valuable (96% and 92%). Participants indicated the workshop would help them practice more safely (80%). In comparison of VASAR with traditional high-fidelity simulation, there were no statistical differences for usefulness of the course (p=0.53), feedback from debriefers (p=0.14), or recommending the course to colleagues (p=0.48).
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that Video-Assisted Simulation with Audience Response can provide an interactive simulated clinical experience which participants find useful to clinical practice, and that VASAR can provide a tool for future strategies in medical education.