European urology · 1997
Transurethral ureteroscopy: is local anesthesia with intravenous sedation sufficiently effective and safe?
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Miroglu C, Saporta L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of local anesthesia and sedation in ureteroscopic interventions and to compare the results with other kinds of anesthesia.
METHODS: 107 ureteroscopic interventions have been done to 99 renoureteral units involving 77 patients under different kinds of anesthesia.
RESULTS: 45 of 107 procedures were performed under general anesthesia, 11 under spinal/epidural anesthesia, and 51 using local anesthesia and intravenous sedation. The overall success rate was 90%. The failure rate was 18% for the procedures undertaken using local anesthesia.
CONCLUSION: Local anesthesia in ureteroscopic interventions may be considered as a first choice because of almost similar success rates to other kinds of anesthesia: is has a low morbidity and low cost.
METHODS: 107 ureteroscopic interventions have been done to 99 renoureteral units involving 77 patients under different kinds of anesthesia.
RESULTS: 45 of 107 procedures were performed under general anesthesia, 11 under spinal/epidural anesthesia, and 51 using local anesthesia and intravenous sedation. The overall success rate was 90%. The failure rate was 18% for the procedures undertaken using local anesthesia.
CONCLUSION: Local anesthesia in ureteroscopic interventions may be considered as a first choice because of almost similar success rates to other kinds of anesthesia: is has a low morbidity and low cost.