MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fsoc.2026.1870432

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in sociology · 2026

Together, alongside or against each other? A qualitative content analysis on the intersystem sensitivity of coaches and physiotherapists in German elite sport support teams.

Steinmann Annika, Jaitner David, Koerner Swen

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This study examines the systemic dynamic of collaboration and the role of intersystem sensitivity between coaches and physiotherapists in German elite sport support teams. Based on a heuristic that integrates theories of society, conflict, and professionalisation within the framework of Niklas Luhmann's sociological systems theory, the study employs qualitative content analysis of expert interviews with representatives of both professional groups (N = 45). The analysis identifies key themes, conflict potentials and avenues for optimisation in intersystem interaction. The findings suggest that effective collaboration in elite sport support teams depends substantially on the ability to understand and respect the professional logics and goals of other support team members. More specifically, the results indicate that promoting intersystem sensitivity and targeted professionalisation processes is necessary to reduce professional conflicts and optimise the joint care of athletes. The study provides valuable insights into the complexity of elite sport support team dynamics and underscores the importance of a collaborative relationship between coaches and physiotherapists for sporting success and the health of elite athletes.

Для цитирования: Steinmann Annika, Jaitner David, Koerner Swen. Together, alongside or against each other? A qualitative content analysis on the intersystem sensitivity of coaches and physiotherapists in German elite sport support teams.. Frontiers in sociology. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2026.1870432.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.