MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica · 1995

The preemptive effect of regional anesthesia on post-cesarean section pain.

Wang J J, Ho S T, Liu H S, Tzeng J I, Tze T S, Liaw W J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The treatment of post-cesarean section (C/S) pain is very important. Since no previous report discussed the preemptive effect of regional anesthesia on post-C/S pain, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of the preemptive effect of regional anesthesia on post-C/S pain.

METHODS

Ninety parturients scheduled for C/S were enrolled into one of the three groups (n = 30, per each group). The parturients in group 1 and 2 received spinal anesthesia and epidural anesthesia, respectively, while those in group 3 received general anesthesia for C/S. Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia, by means of intravenous morphine, was used for all paturients to relieve post-C/S pain. The VAS of pain and total morphine consumption were evaluated in all 3 groups of patients.

RESULTS

The results showed that groups 1 and 2 consumed less morphine than that of group 3. Also, there was no difference between groups 1 and 2 in the amount of morphine consumed. The incidence of side effects was significantly higher in group 3 than in groups 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that spinal or epidural anesthesia reduced the need of parenteral morphine postoperatively when compared with general anesthesia. We suggest that the use of regional anesthesia may provide a better preemptive effect for post-C/S pain.

Для цитирования: Wang J J, Ho S T, Liu H S, Tzeng J I, Tze T S, Liaw W J. The preemptive effect of regional anesthesia on post-cesarean section pain.. Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica. 1995.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.