MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Regional anesthesia · 1994

Deafferentation pain exacerbated by subarachnoid lidocaine and relieved by subarachnoid morphine. Case report.

Iacono R P, Boswell M V, Neumann M

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Neuropathic pain syndromes are often resistant to traditional pharmacologic treatment. The authors describe a patient with chronic deafferentation pain of the legs associated with peripheral neuropathy that was refractory to multidisciplinary pain clinic management.

METHODS

Numerous medications had been tried, including nortriptyline, mexiletine, and oral and parenteral opioids. Spinal cord stimulation was also ineffective, despite a satisfactory pattern of stimulation-induced paresthesias. For diagnostic purposes, differential spinal anesthesia with lidocaine and morphine was performed, with evoked potential monitoring used to evaluate the intensity of spinal anesthetic block.

RESULTS

Paradoxically, lidocaine spinal anesthesia exacerbated pain, whereas subarachnoid morphine provided rapid pain relief. Long-term pain control has been maintained with an implanted spinal infusion pump.

CONCLUSIONS

Evoked potential data acquired during lidocaine spinal anesthesia and the rapid pain relief provided by subarachnoid morphine suggest that deafferentation pain may involve segmental, opioid-sensitive dorsal horn pain generators. The long-term pain relief afforded the patient demonstrates that subarachnoid opioids may be efficacious for some forms of neuropathic pain.

Для цитирования: Iacono R P, Boswell M V, Neumann M. Deafferentation pain exacerbated by subarachnoid lidocaine and relieved by subarachnoid morphine. Case report.. Regional anesthesia. 1994.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.