PloS one · 2026
Work restrictions and Unfitness to work: Prevalence and risk factors a cross-sectional study on 70 000 occupational visits.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dogbla Luther, Gouvenelle Cédric, Escobar Anne-Sophie, Thorin Florence, Jiao Jiao, Zak Marek, Baker Julien S, Pereira Bruno, Dutheil Frédéric
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed work restrictions and unfitness to work simultaneously, particularly on large populations, and evidence on their main influencing factors remains limited.
OBJECTIVE: To assess prevalence and risk factors of work restrictions and unfitness to work.
METHOD: We included all visits conducted in occupational health departments of the Cher, over two consecutive years. Visits had to have a conclusion: fitness to work, temporary work restrictions, permanent work restrictions, and unfitness to work. Mixed multinomial models with individual random effects were used.
RESULTS: Among the 71,848 occupational health visits, 62,436 had a conclusion. Most (90.6%, 95 CI 90.4 to 90.8%) were fit to work, 3.2% (3.1 to 3.3%) had temporary restrictions, 4.9% (4.7 to 5.1%) had permanent restrictions, and 1.3% (1.2 to 1.4%) were unfit to work. The risk of temporary restrictions was multiplied by 1.69 (1.16 to 2.48) in workers over 55 vs < 25 years old; by 1.74 (1.42 to 2.14) in workers with disabilities; by 1.30 (1.07 to 1.58) for workers with 10-20 vs < 5 years of seniority; and by 1.57 (1.22 to 2.01) in companies with 50-199 vs < 10 workers. The risk of permanent restrictions was multiplied by 2.24 (1.68 to 2.97) in workers over 55 yo; by 1.86 (1.57 to 2.21) in workers with disabilities; by 1.47 (1.05 to 2.06) for qualified workers; by 1.24 (1.05 to 1.46) for workers with 10-20 years of seniority; and by 1.30 (1.07 to 1.58) for workers in companies with 50-199 employees. The risk of unfitness to work decreased with increasing seniority in the company, while a significant interaction between sex and sector of activity was observed for temporary restrictions.
CONCLUSION: Nearly one worker out of ten were unfit to work or had restrictions. The main risk factors for both unfit to work and restrictions were older age, women, and return-to-work visits; whereas lower seniority and smaller companies were risk factors for unfit to work, and longer seniority and bigger companies were risk factors for restrictions.
OBJECTIVE: To assess prevalence and risk factors of work restrictions and unfitness to work.
METHOD: We included all visits conducted in occupational health departments of the Cher, over two consecutive years. Visits had to have a conclusion: fitness to work, temporary work restrictions, permanent work restrictions, and unfitness to work. Mixed multinomial models with individual random effects were used.
RESULTS: Among the 71,848 occupational health visits, 62,436 had a conclusion. Most (90.6%, 95 CI 90.4 to 90.8%) were fit to work, 3.2% (3.1 to 3.3%) had temporary restrictions, 4.9% (4.7 to 5.1%) had permanent restrictions, and 1.3% (1.2 to 1.4%) were unfit to work. The risk of temporary restrictions was multiplied by 1.69 (1.16 to 2.48) in workers over 55 vs < 25 years old; by 1.74 (1.42 to 2.14) in workers with disabilities; by 1.30 (1.07 to 1.58) for workers with 10-20 vs < 5 years of seniority; and by 1.57 (1.22 to 2.01) in companies with 50-199 vs < 10 workers. The risk of permanent restrictions was multiplied by 2.24 (1.68 to 2.97) in workers over 55 yo; by 1.86 (1.57 to 2.21) in workers with disabilities; by 1.47 (1.05 to 2.06) for qualified workers; by 1.24 (1.05 to 1.46) for workers with 10-20 years of seniority; and by 1.30 (1.07 to 1.58) for workers in companies with 50-199 employees. The risk of unfitness to work decreased with increasing seniority in the company, while a significant interaction between sex and sector of activity was observed for temporary restrictions.
CONCLUSION: Nearly one worker out of ten were unfit to work or had restrictions. The main risk factors for both unfit to work and restrictions were older age, women, and return-to-work visits; whereas lower seniority and smaller companies were risk factors for unfit to work, and longer seniority and bigger companies were risk factors for restrictions.