Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025
Participation of People With Intellectual Disabilities in the Public, Consumer and Social Spaces: Barriers and Supports.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vidal López Carme, Fullana Noell Judit, Pallisera Díaz María, Rey Freire Ana
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Social inclusion is a fundamental right of people with intellectual disabilities who face ongoing barriers to their community participation (CRPD).
OBJECTIVES: This article presents a qualitative study focused on the experience of 10 people with intellectual disabilities in three key community spaces: public, consumption, and socialisation.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews supported with visual aids were used to identify places frequented, level of involvement, barriers and supports in relation to community participation.
RESULTS: The findings indicate that, although presence in public space is common, interactions are often superficial, limited by a lack of accessibility and discriminatory attitudes. In the consumption space, some people manage to establish meaningful relationships, but economic restrictions and attitudinal barriers persist. In the socialisation space, participation increases when they take on active roles.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for inclusive strategies that favour accessibility, attitudinal and structural changes to ensure full community participation.
OBJECTIVES: This article presents a qualitative study focused on the experience of 10 people with intellectual disabilities in three key community spaces: public, consumption, and socialisation.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews supported with visual aids were used to identify places frequented, level of involvement, barriers and supports in relation to community participation.
RESULTS: The findings indicate that, although presence in public space is common, interactions are often superficial, limited by a lack of accessibility and discriminatory attitudes. In the consumption space, some people manage to establish meaningful relationships, but economic restrictions and attitudinal barriers persist. In the socialisation space, participation increases when they take on active roles.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for inclusive strategies that favour accessibility, attitudinal and structural changes to ensure full community participation.