MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.049

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023

Outcomes of SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Compared With Surgical Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.

Madhavan Mahesh V, Kodali Susheel K, Thourani Vinod H, Makkar Raj, Mack Michael J, Kapadia Samir, Webb John G, Cohen David J, Herrmann Howard C, Williams Mathew, Greason Kevin, Pibarot Philippe, Hahn Rebecca T, Jaber Wael, Xu Ke, Alu Maria, Smith Craig R, Leon Martin B

Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Previous studies demonstrated transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with an earlier generation balloon-expandable valve to be noninferior to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for death and disabling stroke in intermediate-risk patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis at 5 years. However, limited long-term data are available with the more contemporary SAPIEN 3 (S3) bioprosthesis.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare 5-year risk-adjusted outcomes in intermediate-risk patients undergoing S3 TAVR vs SAVR.

METHODS

Propensity score matching was performed to account for baseline differences in intermediate-risk patients undergoing S3 TAVR in the PARTNER 2 (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) S3 single-arm study and SAVR in the PARTNER 2A randomized clinical trial. The primary composite endpoint consisted of 5-year all-cause death and disabling stroke.

RESULTS

A total of 783 matched pairs of intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis were studied. There were no differences in the primary endpoint between S3 TAVR and SAVR at 5 years (40.2% vs 42.7%; HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.74-1.03; P = 0.10). The incidence of mild or greater paravalvular regurgitation was more common after S3 TAVR. There were no differences in structural valve deterioration-related stage 2 and 3 hemodynamic valve deterioration or bioprosthetic valve failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In this propensity-matched analysis of intermediate-risk patients, 5-year rates of death and disabling stroke were similar between S3 TAVR and SAVR. Rates of structural valve deterioration-related hemodynamic valve deterioration were similar, but paravalvular regurgitation was more common after S3 TAVR. Longer-term follow-up is needed to further evaluate differences in late adverse clinical events and bioprosthetic valve durability. (PII S3i [PARTNER II Trial: Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves II - S3 Intermediate], NCT03222128; PII A (PARTNER II Trial: Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves II - XT Intermediate and High Risk], NCT01314313).

Для цитирования: Madhavan Mahesh V, Kodali Susheel K, Thourani Vinod H, Makkar Raj, Mack Michael J, Kapadia Samir, Webb John G, Cohen David J, Herrmann Howard C, Williams Mathew, Greason Kevin, Pibarot Philippe, Hahn Rebecca T, Jaber Wael, Xu Ke, Alu Maria, Smith Craig R, Leon Martin B. Outcomes of SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Compared With Surgical Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.049.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.