Experimental and clinical transplantation : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
Body Function and Structure, Activity, and Participation Limitations of Lung Transplant Recipients Within the Scope of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ar Ulas, Yekeler Erdal, Calik-Kutukcu Ebru
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: There is no study in the literature that specifically evaluates lung transplant recipients in the long-term under the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between lung transplant recipient age, age at transplant, and comorbidity levels and the body structure and functions and the activity and participation levels of patients within the scope of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 27 lung transplant recipients according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health items in domain b (body functions), domain s (body structures), and domain d (activities and participation). For domain b, sleep functions, psychosocial status, respiratory functions, and upper and lower extremity exercise capacity were evaluated. Posture was evaluated for the s domain. Balance, arm functional capacity, health-related quality of life, and physical activity were evaluated for domain d.
RESULTS: As the age of lung transplant recipients and the age at transplant increase, their sleep quality and respiratory functions decreased, and postural impairment increased. There was a negative correlation between age at transplant and functional exercise capacity (P < .05). As the comorbidity level of the recipient increases, the upper and lower extremity exercise capacity, physical activity level, and quality of life declined. There was a moderately positive correlation between the level of comorbidity and balance disorder (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: We found the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health framework to be useful for the evaluation and for planning pulmonary rehabilitation for lung transplant recipients; it can bring a new perspective to physiotherapists specialized in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 27 lung transplant recipients according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health items in domain b (body functions), domain s (body structures), and domain d (activities and participation). For domain b, sleep functions, psychosocial status, respiratory functions, and upper and lower extremity exercise capacity were evaluated. Posture was evaluated for the s domain. Balance, arm functional capacity, health-related quality of life, and physical activity were evaluated for domain d.
RESULTS: As the age of lung transplant recipients and the age at transplant increase, their sleep quality and respiratory functions decreased, and postural impairment increased. There was a negative correlation between age at transplant and functional exercise capacity (P < .05). As the comorbidity level of the recipient increases, the upper and lower extremity exercise capacity, physical activity level, and quality of life declined. There was a moderately positive correlation between the level of comorbidity and balance disorder (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: We found the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health framework to be useful for the evaluation and for planning pulmonary rehabilitation for lung transplant recipients; it can bring a new perspective to physiotherapists specialized in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.