Pharmacopsychiatry · 2017
The Personal Antipsychotic Choice Index.
СтатьяМетаанализОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Dijk Floor, de Wit Iris, Blankers Matthijs, Sommer Iris, de Haan Lieuwe
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: We present an online decision aid to involve patients with a psychotic disorder in shared decision-making concerning the selection of antipsychotic medication.
METHOD: Patients selected effectiveness and adverse effects criteria from the Subject's Response to Antipsychotics-34 questionnaire. Numerical data from meta-analyses, clinical trial data, receptor affinities and expert opinions were used to rank antipsychotics on each criterion. When using the the tool, patients indicate on a 5-point Likert scale how they value each (adverse) effect. The Likert scale values are combined in an algorithm with the rank orders of antipsychotics to create a personalized ranking.
RESULTS: Criteria used were: effectiveness concerning psychotic, depressive and cognitive symptoms, weight gain, sexual dysfunction, drowsiness, hypersomnia, extrapyramidal symptoms, anticholinergic adverse effects, hypersalivation, nausea, dizziness, energy loss, blunted affect/less need for companionship. High-level evidence was available for ranking weight gain, sexual dysfunction, menstrual disorders, extrapyramidal symptoms and effectiveness on psychotic symptoms. We used lower level evidence ranking the remaining criteria.
DISCUSSION: A transparent procedure has resulted in an updateable tool to produce individual ranking of antipsychotics based on the patients' input.
METHOD: Patients selected effectiveness and adverse effects criteria from the Subject's Response to Antipsychotics-34 questionnaire. Numerical data from meta-analyses, clinical trial data, receptor affinities and expert opinions were used to rank antipsychotics on each criterion. When using the the tool, patients indicate on a 5-point Likert scale how they value each (adverse) effect. The Likert scale values are combined in an algorithm with the rank orders of antipsychotics to create a personalized ranking.
RESULTS: Criteria used were: effectiveness concerning psychotic, depressive and cognitive symptoms, weight gain, sexual dysfunction, drowsiness, hypersomnia, extrapyramidal symptoms, anticholinergic adverse effects, hypersalivation, nausea, dizziness, energy loss, blunted affect/less need for companionship. High-level evidence was available for ranking weight gain, sexual dysfunction, menstrual disorders, extrapyramidal symptoms and effectiveness on psychotic symptoms. We used lower level evidence ranking the remaining criteria.
DISCUSSION: A transparent procedure has resulted in an updateable tool to produce individual ranking of antipsychotics based on the patients' input.