MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1039856216649768

Медицинская библиотека · Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2016

Fever, confusion, acute kidney injury: is this atypical neuroleptic malignant syndrome following polypharmacy with clozapine and risperidone?

Cherry Scott, Siskind Dan, Spivak Valeria, Wysoczanski Daniel, Halangoda Priyangika

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Clozapine is the gold-standard antipsychotic medication for treatment-refractory schizophrenia (TRS). However, one potentially lethal side effect of clozapine, as with other antipsychotics, is neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) which could present differently in clozapine therapy. 'Atypical NMS' is a recognised variant of NMS with less rigidity and delayed elevation of creatine kinase; this variant is associated with clozapine.

METHOD: A case from the author's clinical practice was reviewed.

RESULTS

A 67-year-old man with TRS was treated with clozapine. Unfortunately, his physical condition deteriorated and he presented with atypical NMS, which initially was treated as presumable urinary tract infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Atypical NMS is associated with clozapine. This case exposes the potential difficulties in diagnosis, and highlights the importance of considering less common diagnoses in acutely unwell psychiatric patients.

Для цитирования: Cherry Scott, Siskind Dan, Spivak Valeria, Wysoczanski Daniel, Halangoda Priyangika. Fever, confusion, acute kidney injury: is this atypical neuroleptic malignant syndrome following polypharmacy with clozapine and risperidone?. Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/1039856216649768.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.