MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/wnf.0000000000000106

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical neuropharmacology · 2015

Are Second-Generation Antipsychotics Useful in Tardive Dystonia?

Pinninti Narsimha Reddy, Faden Justin, Adityanjee Adit

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To review the current evidence on the effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in the treatment of tardive dystonia (TDt) and give recommendations for treatment.

METHODS

Medline/PubMed/Psyclit/Embase database searches were conducted in January 2015, and a manual review of references within the retrieved articles was done. All articles in English and those that had English abstracts and dealt with treatment of TDt were included.

RESULTS

Our search and review yielded a total of 88 reports (none of them a controlled trial) involving 145 patients treated with one of the 5 SGAs. Clozapine has the maximum number of published reports (52 reports involving 90 subjects, whereas there were 36 reports involving 55 subjects treated with other SGAs, including olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and perospirone).

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence points to the effectiveness of clozapine as monotherapy and in combination with clonazepam for the treatment of TDt. When clozapine is not an option, olanzapine and quetiapine are reasonable alternatives. Given the lack of controlled trials, future focus should be on conducting randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, collaborative controlled clinical trials of several years' duration.

Для цитирования: Pinninti Narsimha Reddy, Faden Justin, Adityanjee Adit. Are Second-Generation Antipsychotics Useful in Tardive Dystonia?. Clinical neuropharmacology. 2015. DOI: 10.1097/wnf.0000000000000106.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.