Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology · 2026
Unmet assistive technology needs among working-age adults with disabilities in India: findings from longitudinal ageing study in India (LASI) wave 1.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rehman Tanveer, Dutta Sritama, Sahoo Jangyarupa, Das Akansha, Sahoo Archita, Mohanty Priyansha, Yadav Jeetendra, Kanungo Srikanta, Pati Sanghamitra
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Despite policy advances, access to assistive technology (AT) in India remains critically inadequate, particularly for working-age adults with disabilities.
METHOD: Using nationally representative data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) Wave 1, we analysed data from 2,743 individuals aged 18-59 years who reported at least one functional impairment to estimate the prevalence and distribution of unmet AT needs. Unmet need was defined as functional impairment without use of a corresponding assistive product; this proxy reflects potential rather than expressed need and may not capture individual preferences or contextual factors influencing utilisation.
RESULTS: Overall, 60.1% had unmet AT needs, with higher prevalence among rural residents (69.6%), younger adults aged 18-44 years (72.2%), and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups (73.3%). Although descriptive analysis showed higher unmet need among women, multivariable regression indicated significantly higher adjusted odds among men after adjusting for socioeconomic factors. Unmet need was extremely high for hearing and speech impairments (97.1% each) and remained substantial even among employed individuals (58.2%). Vision impairments had comparatively lower unmet need, likely due to better availability of spectacles.
CONCLUSION: Disparities were evident across age, gender, residence, education, wealth, and caste. Gender disparities in assistive technology access arise from financial, caregiving, and mobility barriers, emphasising the need for gender-responsive policies to ensure equity. These findings highlight persistent gaps in AT provision and the need for equity-focused strategies to advance disability-inclusive development and economic participation.
METHOD: Using nationally representative data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) Wave 1, we analysed data from 2,743 individuals aged 18-59 years who reported at least one functional impairment to estimate the prevalence and distribution of unmet AT needs. Unmet need was defined as functional impairment without use of a corresponding assistive product; this proxy reflects potential rather than expressed need and may not capture individual preferences or contextual factors influencing utilisation.
RESULTS: Overall, 60.1% had unmet AT needs, with higher prevalence among rural residents (69.6%), younger adults aged 18-44 years (72.2%), and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups (73.3%). Although descriptive analysis showed higher unmet need among women, multivariable regression indicated significantly higher adjusted odds among men after adjusting for socioeconomic factors. Unmet need was extremely high for hearing and speech impairments (97.1% each) and remained substantial even among employed individuals (58.2%). Vision impairments had comparatively lower unmet need, likely due to better availability of spectacles.
CONCLUSION: Disparities were evident across age, gender, residence, education, wealth, and caste. Gender disparities in assistive technology access arise from financial, caregiving, and mobility barriers, emphasising the need for gender-responsive policies to ensure equity. These findings highlight persistent gaps in AT provision and the need for equity-focused strategies to advance disability-inclusive development and economic participation.