BMJ open · 2026
Women in their 40s responding to the 2024 United States Preventive Services Task Force mammography guideline update: a focus group study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Scherer Laura D, Parmet Tamar, Schapira Marilyn M, Cappella Joseph N, Hersch Jolyn, McCaffery Kirsten, Lewis Carmen L, Tate Channing E, Morse Brad
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Focus groups involving US women aged 40-49 were conducted to identify women's attitudes towards the 2024 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) mammography guideline, particularly the change in emphasis away from informed choice. Focus groups explored what information women feel they need to receive about screening benefits and harms prior to getting a mammogram.
DESIGN: Seven focus groups of 4-6 women were conducted 3-4 months following the USPSTF guideline announcement.
SETTING: Participants were recruited from two healthcare systems in the USA and participated in focus groups via Zoom.
PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 40-49 with no history of breast cancer. Purposive sampling stratified by race, education and screening preferences.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants had previously received a Decision Aid as part of a parent study informing them of the pre-2024 USPSTF guideline and mammography mortality benefit, false positives and overdiagnosis.
MAIN MEASURES: Rapid qualitative analysis focused on summarising groups' answers to questions posed to the focus groups.
RESULTS: Groups were generally positive towards lowering the screening age to 40 but felt that screening frequency should be tailored to personal cancer risk. They strongly emphasised the importance of being informed about both the benefits and harms of mammography, despite the reduced emphasis on informed choice, and stressed a desire for transparency and autonomy.
CONCLUSIONS: US women were positive about the recommendation to screen at age 40 but wanted screening frequency to be tailored to their cancer risk. They valued being fully informed of both screening benefits and harms and expected that all women should be fully informed.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05838417.
DESIGN: Seven focus groups of 4-6 women were conducted 3-4 months following the USPSTF guideline announcement.
SETTING: Participants were recruited from two healthcare systems in the USA and participated in focus groups via Zoom.
PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 40-49 with no history of breast cancer. Purposive sampling stratified by race, education and screening preferences.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants had previously received a Decision Aid as part of a parent study informing them of the pre-2024 USPSTF guideline and mammography mortality benefit, false positives and overdiagnosis.
MAIN MEASURES: Rapid qualitative analysis focused on summarising groups' answers to questions posed to the focus groups.
RESULTS: Groups were generally positive towards lowering the screening age to 40 but felt that screening frequency should be tailored to personal cancer risk. They strongly emphasised the importance of being informed about both the benefits and harms of mammography, despite the reduced emphasis on informed choice, and stressed a desire for transparency and autonomy.
CONCLUSIONS: US women were positive about the recommendation to screen at age 40 but wanted screening frequency to be tailored to their cancer risk. They valued being fully informed of both screening benefits and harms and expected that all women should be fully informed.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05838417.