MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1100/2012/512047

Медицинская библиотека · TheScientificWorldJournal · 2012

Auditing clinical outcomes after introducing off-licence prescribing of atypical antipsychotic melperone for patients with treatment refractory schizophrenia.

Röhricht Frank, Gadhia Seema, Alam Rinku, Willis Melissa

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIMS AND METHOD: To evaluate the practical utility of off-licence prescribing and clinical outcomes of treatment with atypical antipsychotic Melperone.

METHOD: Prospective data collection on patient's clinical characteristics and outcomes.

RESULTS

17 patients with a diagnosis of refractory schizophrenia were identified as suitable for off-license prescribing of Melperone and commenced treatment (13 were previously treated with Clozapine). Seven of those currently remain on Melperone (41%), and for six patents, the BPRS symptom scores reduced significantly over time (24-61%) additionally patients displayed improvements of their quality of life. Six patients were discontinued due to noncompliance and/or side effects. Melperone was ineffective in the other four patients.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The example of a small group of patients responding well to a comparably safe and inexpensive atypical antipsychotic with favourable side effect profile should encourage clinicians to use this tool as third-line treatment and to conduct more systematic clinical research.

Для цитирования: Röhricht Frank, Gadhia Seema, Alam Rinku, Willis Melissa. Auditing clinical outcomes after introducing off-licence prescribing of atypical antipsychotic melperone for patients with treatment refractory schizophrenia.. TheScientificWorldJournal. 2012. DOI: 10.1100/2012/512047.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.