Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026
Access Block and Ambulance Ramping: The Canaries of the Healthcare System.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boyle Justin, Staib Andrew, Sullivan Clair, Khanna Sankalp, Diouf Ibrahima, Hassanzadeh Hamed, Yoon Jin, Riahi Vahid, Samadbeik Mahnaz, Bosley Emma, Lind James
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To identify evidence-based factors leading to the global challenge of hospital access block and inform strategies to improve emergency access performance.
METHODS: A mixed methods approach was followed comprising an umbrella review of published systematic reviews, qualitative analysis of the perspectives of patients and healthcare workers, and quantitative analysis of contextual factors and 6 years of ambulance, emergency inpatient and ward movement records for the 25 largest public hospitals in Queensland, Australia.
RESULTS: A key set of findings and recommendations were identified to improve emergency access that are practical and actionable. These comprise the introduction of inpatient discharge metrics and monitoring to shift focus from the front door of hospitals to the 'back door'; increasing support for primary care, community care, aged care, NDIS and vulnerable groups; maintaining demand-side strategies such as increasing inpatient-equivalent care alternatives (e.g., hospital in the home, acute care within nursing home services); investment in prehospital flow; improving hospital processes such as extended-hour discharge lounges; improving workforce; and revising funding policies.
CONCLUSIONS: The study findings fill a gap in the evidence regarding challenges and recommendations for improving patient flow within hospital emergency departments and across the broader health system. Focussing efforts at the 'back end' of the inpatient journey is a critical step to improve emergency care outcomes.
METHODS: A mixed methods approach was followed comprising an umbrella review of published systematic reviews, qualitative analysis of the perspectives of patients and healthcare workers, and quantitative analysis of contextual factors and 6 years of ambulance, emergency inpatient and ward movement records for the 25 largest public hospitals in Queensland, Australia.
RESULTS: A key set of findings and recommendations were identified to improve emergency access that are practical and actionable. These comprise the introduction of inpatient discharge metrics and monitoring to shift focus from the front door of hospitals to the 'back door'; increasing support for primary care, community care, aged care, NDIS and vulnerable groups; maintaining demand-side strategies such as increasing inpatient-equivalent care alternatives (e.g., hospital in the home, acute care within nursing home services); investment in prehospital flow; improving hospital processes such as extended-hour discharge lounges; improving workforce; and revising funding policies.
CONCLUSIONS: The study findings fill a gap in the evidence regarding challenges and recommendations for improving patient flow within hospital emergency departments and across the broader health system. Focussing efforts at the 'back end' of the inpatient journey is a critical step to improve emergency care outcomes.