MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2009.02.019

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of affective disorders · 2009

Patient-rated troubling symptoms of depression instrument results correlate with traditional clinician- and patient-rated measures: a secondary analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Pandina Gahan J, Revicki Dennis A, Kleinman Leah, Turkoz Ibrahim, Wu Jasmanda H, Kujawa Mary J, Mahmoud Ramy, Gharabawi Georges M

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The Patient-Rated Troubling Symptoms of Depression (PaRTS-D) instrument assesses the presence and troublesomeness of 8 commonly reported depression-related symptoms from the patient's perspective. A post hoc analysis of a double-blind, randomized risperidone augmentation to antidepressant therapy trial in patients with major depressive disorder explored the relationship between the PaRTS-D instrument and other clinician- and patient-rating scales.

METHODS

Patients completed the PaRTS-D; the Patient Global Improvement Scale (PGIS), Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), while clinicians completed the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17), and the Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S) at baseline and at pre-determined study weeks.

RESULTS

In the PaRTS-D instrument, the four most frequently reported and troublesome symptoms were sadness (73.5%, severity 6.8), trouble concentrating (70.9%, 7.3), reduced involvement in pleasurable activities (61.9%, 7.3), and being tense or uptight (56.0%, 6.7). The improvement in PaRTS-D total score was significantly greater in risperidone-augmented compared with placebo-augmented patients at week 4 (p=0.034) and week 6 (p=0.007). Pearson correlations between the PaRTS-D scores and the measures of HRSD-17, CGI-S, PGIS, Q-LES-Q, and SDS were significant at both baseline and at week 6 LOCF (p<0.001 for each comparison).

LIMITATIONS: Results are from a post hoc analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant correlations were observed between the PaRTS-D and other clinician- and patient-rated measures, with PaRTS-D being sensitive to the effects of treatment. These findings suggest that the PaRTS-D instrument is a reliable scale to assess antidepressant activity as experienced by the patients.

Для цитирования: Pandina Gahan J, Revicki Dennis A, Kleinman Leah, Turkoz Ibrahim, Wu Jasmanda H, Kujawa Mary J, Mahmoud Ramy, Gharabawi Georges M. Patient-rated troubling symptoms of depression instrument results correlate with traditional clinician- and patient-rated measures: a secondary analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.. Journal of affective disorders. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.02.019.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.