Cureus · 2026
Comparative Evaluation of Flexural and Impact Strengths of Glass Fiber- and Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticle-Reinforced Polymethyl Methacrylate Denture Base Resin: An In Vitro Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ponjayanthi V, Vishali S, Subramanian Suganya, Peter Claudia, Mani Jeevitha, Maheswaran Thangadurai
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effects of glass fiber and titanium dioxide (TiO₂) nanoparticle reinforcement on the flexural and impact strengths of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) denture base resin.
METHODS: Forty rectangular heat-activated acrylic denture base specimens with dimensions of 65 mm × 10 mm × 3.3 mm and 80 mm × 4 mm × 10 mm were fabricated to determine the flexural and impact strengths in accordance with ISO#1567 with an estimated sample size of 10 per group, which was further divided into five for flexural and five for impact strength. Group 1 (Control group) contains conventional heat-activated acrylic denture base resin, Group 2 has 2% TiO2 nanoparticle-incorporated heat-cured acrylic denture base resin, Group 3 comprises 2% glass fiber-incorporated heat-cured acrylic denture base resin, and Group 4 (Hybrid group) comprises 2% TiO2+2% glass fiber-incorporated heat-cured acrylic denture base resin. The fabrication followed the compression molding technique and a long curing cycle, and the specimens were tested for flexural and impact strengths.
RESULT: The hybrid reinforcement group (Group 4; 2% TiO₂ + 2% glass fiber) demonstrated the highest flexural strength (100.32 ± 4.21 MPa), followed by the glass fiber-reinforced group (Group 3; 92.71 ± 3.93 MPa), the TiO₂-reinforced group (Group 2; 84.87 ± 3.78 MPa), and the conventional PMMA group (Group 1; 76.35 ± 2.61 MPa). Similarly, the highest impact strength was observed in Group 4 (5.13 ± 0.43 kJ/m²), followed by Group 3 (4.90 ± 0.39 kJ/m²), Group 2 (3.87 ± 0.45 kJ/m²), and Group 1 (1.48 ± 0.26 kJ/m²).
CONCLUSION: Hybrid reinforcement with TiO2 and glass fiber exhibited better flexural and impact strengths than conventional TiO2 and glass fiber-reinforced PMMA.
METHODS: Forty rectangular heat-activated acrylic denture base specimens with dimensions of 65 mm × 10 mm × 3.3 mm and 80 mm × 4 mm × 10 mm were fabricated to determine the flexural and impact strengths in accordance with ISO#1567 with an estimated sample size of 10 per group, which was further divided into five for flexural and five for impact strength. Group 1 (Control group) contains conventional heat-activated acrylic denture base resin, Group 2 has 2% TiO2 nanoparticle-incorporated heat-cured acrylic denture base resin, Group 3 comprises 2% glass fiber-incorporated heat-cured acrylic denture base resin, and Group 4 (Hybrid group) comprises 2% TiO2+2% glass fiber-incorporated heat-cured acrylic denture base resin. The fabrication followed the compression molding technique and a long curing cycle, and the specimens were tested for flexural and impact strengths.
RESULT: The hybrid reinforcement group (Group 4; 2% TiO₂ + 2% glass fiber) demonstrated the highest flexural strength (100.32 ± 4.21 MPa), followed by the glass fiber-reinforced group (Group 3; 92.71 ± 3.93 MPa), the TiO₂-reinforced group (Group 2; 84.87 ± 3.78 MPa), and the conventional PMMA group (Group 1; 76.35 ± 2.61 MPa). Similarly, the highest impact strength was observed in Group 4 (5.13 ± 0.43 kJ/m²), followed by Group 3 (4.90 ± 0.39 kJ/m²), Group 2 (3.87 ± 0.45 kJ/m²), and Group 1 (1.48 ± 0.26 kJ/m²).
CONCLUSION: Hybrid reinforcement with TiO2 and glass fiber exhibited better flexural and impact strengths than conventional TiO2 and glass fiber-reinforced PMMA.