Journal of continuing education in nursing · 2026
Multicenter Online Nursing Education to Improve Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Administration: A Descriptive Post-Education Survey.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Owodunni Oluwafemi P, Lau Brandyn D, Shaffer Dauryne L, Moreno Ashley N, Villarreal Cynthia L, Price Michelle A, Kraus Peggy S, Varasteh Kia Mujan, Armocida Stephanie M, Holzmueller Christine G, Streiff Michael B, Haut Elliott R, Consortium of Leaders in the study Of Traumatic Thromboembolism 3 (CLOTT 3) Investigators Group
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) causes preventable harm, and risk-appropriate prophylaxis administration is often suboptimal because of inconsistent practices and gaps in knowledge. The authors disseminated a validated web-based interactive nurse education module on VTE prevention and evaluated nurses' perspectives.
METHOD: A descriptive cross-sectional electronic post-education survey of trauma nurses was conducted at nine Level I to II centers in the Consortium of Leaders in the study Of Traumatic Thromboembolism (CLOTT) Network. Data were summarized descriptively and with conventional content analysis.
RESULTS: Of 922 participants, 817 completed the post-education survey (88.6% response rate). A high proportion of positive ratings were received for applicability (96%), communication (95%), appropriateness (92%), engagement (87%), satisfaction (78%), and preference over other online clinical education modules (77%). Qualitatively, 53.7% responded positively (appropriateness and satisfaction), whereas 40.7% responded negatively (technology and variation in institutional electronic systems).
CONCLUSION: Nurses rated the module as applicable to bedside practice. Feedback highlighted role-specific relevance and realistic scenarios and identified cross-site technology and workflow fit as considerations for broader dissemination.
METHOD: A descriptive cross-sectional electronic post-education survey of trauma nurses was conducted at nine Level I to II centers in the Consortium of Leaders in the study Of Traumatic Thromboembolism (CLOTT) Network. Data were summarized descriptively and with conventional content analysis.
RESULTS: Of 922 participants, 817 completed the post-education survey (88.6% response rate). A high proportion of positive ratings were received for applicability (96%), communication (95%), appropriateness (92%), engagement (87%), satisfaction (78%), and preference over other online clinical education modules (77%). Qualitatively, 53.7% responded positively (appropriateness and satisfaction), whereas 40.7% responded negatively (technology and variation in institutional electronic systems).
CONCLUSION: Nurses rated the module as applicable to bedside practice. Feedback highlighted role-specific relevance and realistic scenarios and identified cross-site technology and workflow fit as considerations for broader dissemination.