The Australian journal of rural health · 2026
Strengthening Rural Health With N-of-1 Trials and Single-Case Experimental Designs.
Редакционная статьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nikles Jane, McDonald Suzanne
Аннотация
THE CHALLENGE: Rural and remote clinicians frequently make treatment decisions under conditions of uncertainty, exacerbated by limited access to specialist services, fewer locally available treatment options, and evidence that may not fully inform care for an individual patient.
THE OPPORTUNITY: N-of-1 trials and related single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) offer a structured method for generating individual-level evidence to support treatment decisions yet remain rarely used in routine clinical practice. Beyond informing care for individual patients, aggregated N-of-1 trials can also generate evidence that is directly relevant to rural populations and models of care.
IMPLICATIONS: This editorial outlines the potential of N-of-1 trials and SCEDs in rural and remote health and argues that increasing awareness, training, and practical support could enable their wider adoption.
THE OPPORTUNITY: N-of-1 trials and related single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) offer a structured method for generating individual-level evidence to support treatment decisions yet remain rarely used in routine clinical practice. Beyond informing care for individual patients, aggregated N-of-1 trials can also generate evidence that is directly relevant to rural populations and models of care.
IMPLICATIONS: This editorial outlines the potential of N-of-1 trials and SCEDs in rural and remote health and argues that increasing awareness, training, and practical support could enable their wider adoption.