The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
Delay in diagnosis of lung cancer in general practice.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bjerager Marianne, Palshof Torben, Dahl Ronald, Vedsted Peter, Olesen Frede
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is a common cancer disease; nevertheless, in Denmark a GP only sees one new case of lung cancer per year. The core symptoms of lung cancer, cough and dyspnoea, are on the other hand very common in general practice. This represents a challenge to the diagnostic process and increases the risk of diagnostic delay.
AIM: To explore diagnostic delay in primary health care among patients with lung cancer.
DESIGN OF STUDY: A population based observational case series of 84 lung cancer patients' delay.
SETTING: The County of Aarhus, Denmark.
METHOD: From county-based registers of all histological and cytological tests we identified all patients in the County of Aarhus with lung cancer diagnosed during a 6 month period in 2003. Inclusion was verified by contacting the departments involved in the treatment of lung cancer. Data were based on telephone interviews with patients' GPs. A review of delay was made starting with the first symptom until referral to secondary care.
RESULTS: The overall median delay in primary health care was 32.5 days (interquartile interval (IQI) = 12-68 days). One-third of the patients were referred to the diagnostic investigation after their first consultation. Important reasons for delay in primary care were: symptoms not related to the lungs, chest X-ray without suspicion of cancer, comorbidity, waiting times for investigations and lack of explicit follow-up appointment. Prolonged delay was often due to a combination of these factors.
CONCLUSION: When diagnosing lung cancer, it is important that GPs are aware of the low sensitivity of chest X-ray. Shorter waiting times for investigations could reduce delay considerably.
AIM: To explore diagnostic delay in primary health care among patients with lung cancer.
DESIGN OF STUDY: A population based observational case series of 84 lung cancer patients' delay.
SETTING: The County of Aarhus, Denmark.
METHOD: From county-based registers of all histological and cytological tests we identified all patients in the County of Aarhus with lung cancer diagnosed during a 6 month period in 2003. Inclusion was verified by contacting the departments involved in the treatment of lung cancer. Data were based on telephone interviews with patients' GPs. A review of delay was made starting with the first symptom until referral to secondary care.
RESULTS: The overall median delay in primary health care was 32.5 days (interquartile interval (IQI) = 12-68 days). One-third of the patients were referred to the diagnostic investigation after their first consultation. Important reasons for delay in primary care were: symptoms not related to the lungs, chest X-ray without suspicion of cancer, comorbidity, waiting times for investigations and lack of explicit follow-up appointment. Prolonged delay was often due to a combination of these factors.
CONCLUSION: When diagnosing lung cancer, it is important that GPs are aware of the low sensitivity of chest X-ray. Shorter waiting times for investigations could reduce delay considerably.