MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00033

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in psychiatry · 2011

Acamprosate and Baclofen were Not Effective in the Treatment of Pathological Gambling: Preliminary Blind Rater Comparison Study.

Dannon Pinhas N, Rosenberg Oded, Schoenfeld Netta, Kotler Moshe

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Pathological gambling (PG) is a highly prevalent and disabling impulse control disorder. A range of psychopharmacological options are available for the treatment of PG, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, opioid receptor antagonists, anti-addiction drugs, and mood stabilizers. In our preliminary study, we examined the efficacy of two anti-addiction drugs, baclofen and acamprosate, in the treatment of PG.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Seventeen male gamblers were randomly divided into two groups. Each group received one of the two drugs without being blind to treatment. All patients underwent a comprehensive psychiatric diagnostic evaluation and completed a series of semi-structured interviews. During the 6-months of study, monthly evaluations were carried out to assess improvement and relapses. Relapse was defined as recurrent gambling behavior.

RESULTS

None of the 17 patients reached the 6-months abstinence. One patient receiving baclofen sustained abstinence for 4 months. Fourteen patients succeeded in sustaining abstinence for 1-3 months. Two patients stopped attending monthly evaluations.

CONCLUSION

Baclofen and acamprosate did not prove efficient in treating pathological gamblers.

Для цитирования: Dannon Pinhas N, Rosenberg Oded, Schoenfeld Netta, Kotler Moshe. Acamprosate and Baclofen were Not Effective in the Treatment of Pathological Gambling: Preliminary Blind Rater Comparison Study.. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2011. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00033.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.