DOI 10.1007/s12282-019-00972-5
Reproductive history and breast cancer survival: a prospective patient cohort study in Japan.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Reproductive factors may influence breast cancer progression and patient survival; however, evidence has been limited.
METHODS
The associations of reproductive factors with tumor characteristics and patient survival were analyzed among 1468 breast cancer patients diagnosed during 1997-2013 at a single institute in Japan. The patients were followed until 2016. During a median follow-up period of 8.6 years, 272 all-cause and 199 breast cancer deaths were documented.
RESULTS
In case-case comparisons, later age at menarche was inversely associated with advanced tumors. Nulliparous patients tended to have receptor-positive [estrogen receptor (ER)+ or progesterone receptor (PR)+] tumors. Conversely, the Cox proportional-hazards model including adjustment for tumor characteristics revealed U-shaped relationship between parity number and the risk of all-cause death among the patients overall [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.10 for nulliparous, 1.28 for 2, and 1.50 for ≥ 3 vs. one child]. According to hormone receptor, later age at menarche and later age at last birth were positively associated with the risk of all-cause death among patients with ER- and PR- cancer (menarche, HR = 2.18 for ≥ 15 vs. ≤ 12 years, ptrend = 0.03; last birth, HR = 3.10 for ≥ 35 vs. ≤ 29 years, ptrend = 0.01). A shorter time since last birth was associated with the risk of death among receptor-positive patients (HR = 5.72 for ≤ 4 vs. ≥ 10 years, ptrend = 0.004).
CONCLUSION
The results indicate that the timing of menarche and parity have significant effects on patient survival, providing clues for understanding the association between women's life course and breast cancer outcome.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.