MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/ccid.s326105

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2021

Teledermatology Service During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: A Mobile Application-Based Retrospective Study.

Mu Zhanglei, Liu Xiaojing, Li Kun, Zhang Jianzhong

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, teledermatology service was increased rapidly. The purpose of our study was to analyze the characteristics of patients and common skin diseases via teledermatology during the COVID-19 pandemic in mainland China.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

During weekends between January 21 and April 4, 2020, the data of patients who used teledermatology service via a mobile application were collected, including gender, age, and diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 698 patients (315 men and 383 women), with a mean age of 26 years, used this service. The top ten common diseases in order of proportion were eczema (22%), acne (9%), atopic dermatitis (9%), urticaria (5%), contact dermatitis (5%), herpes zoster (3%), warts (3%), folliculitis (3%), prurigo (3%), and androgenetic alopecia (2%). When classified according to age groups, atopic dermatitis was the most common condition for patients in the first decade, acne was more prevalent in the second and third decades, and eczema was the most prevalent condition for all other age groups.

CONCLUSION

The ten common diseases accounted for the majority of the evaluated cases and varied by age group, allowing individualizing teledermatology services.

Для цитирования: Mu Zhanglei, Liu Xiaojing, Li Kun, Zhang Jianzhong. Teledermatology Service During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: A Mobile Application-Based Retrospective Study.. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology. 2021. DOI: 10.2147/ccid.s326105.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.