MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0970-2113.59261

Медицинская библиотека · Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2010

Prescription pattern in asthma therapy at Gorakhpur hospitals.

Pandey Awanish, Tripathi Poonam, Pandey Rishabh Dev

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This prescription-monitoring study was conducted to establish the drug-prescribing trend of anti-asthmatic drugs in various hospitals of Gorakhpur.

SETTING

The study covered three famous hospitals of Gorakhpur.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Hundred patients were studied using a prescription auditing performa. Data was recorded from the patient's attending the out patient department using a chance random sample method for two months. Patients who co- operated were interviewed and information was filled in the performa.

RESULTS

The results suggested that b-agonist (40%) were the most frequently prescribed anti-asthmatic drugs followed by Methylxanthine (27%), corticosteroids (25%), leukotriene antagonist (4.4%) and anti-histaminics (3.6%) was the least prescribed. Analysis of prescription revealed that multiple drug therapy (81%) was opted for a significant number of patients as compared to single drug therapy (19%). Contrary to popular belief, oral dosage form tablets (56.3%) were preferred over inhalation (33.8%).

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that the present prescribing pattern of anti-asthmatics in Gorakhpur does not completely meet standard guidelines of asthma treatment. Hence there is a need to encourage physicians of Gorakhpur to follow the guidelines while treating asthma.

Для цитирования: Pandey Awanish, Tripathi Poonam, Pandey Rishabh Dev. Prescription pattern in asthma therapy at Gorakhpur hospitals.. Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society. 2010. DOI: 10.4103/0970-2113.59261.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.