MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s13187-017-1211-x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018

Determinants of Cancer Screening Disparities Among Asian Americans: A Systematic Review of Public Health Surveys.

Jun Jungmi, Nan Xiaoli

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We conducted a systematic analysis of 24 peer-reviewed literary works that examined Asian Americans' breast, cervical, and colon cancer screening, focusing on empirical findings from large-scale public health surveys (i.e., NHIS, CHIS, HINTS, BRFSS). We provide an overview of relevant research in terms of study characteristics, samples, predictor/covariate of cancer screenings, and key findings. Our analysis indicates that Asian Americans' cancer screening rates are lower than for non-Hispanic Whites for all cancer types in four large-scale public health surveys throughout 17 study years. Acculturation and healthcare access were two significant factors in explaining Asian Americans' cancer screening rates. Cancer fatalism and family cancer history emerged as potential factors that may account for more variances. However, the screening disparities between Asian Americans and whites persist even after adjusting all covariates, including SES, acculturation, healthcare access, health status, and health perception/literacy. More individual and cultural factors should be identified to address these disparities.

Для цитирования: Jun Jungmi, Nan Xiaoli. Determinants of Cancer Screening Disparities Among Asian Americans: A Systematic Review of Public Health Surveys.. Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1211-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.