Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2015
Willingness of Japanese patients with breast cancer to have genetic testing of BRCA without burden of expenses.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakagomi Hiroshi, Sakamoto Ikuko, Hirotsu Yosuke, Amemiya Kenji, Mochizuki Hitoshi, Inoue Masayuki, Nakagomi Satoko, Kubota Takeo, Omata Masao
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Genetic analysis for individuals who are at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) has becoming widely accepted. The poor introduction of the genetic testing of BRCA in Japan compared with western countries could be due to insufficient recognition of its importance, prejudice against a heredity disease, especially in non-urban districts, and its high cost. There is few available data regarding the acceptance or willingness to have genetic testing among Japanese who are at risk and living outside Tokyo.
METHODS: Of 670 patients seen and detailed family history taken at our hospital, located non-urban, 30 (4 %) gave the family history of breast cancer in more than 2 members within the second degree relatives ("stronger" family history group), 92 (14 %) in 1 member ("weaker" group), and 548 (82 %) in none of members ("sporadic" group). Then, we selected 107 (24 from "stronger", 50 from "weaker", 33 from "sporadic" family history group) to see if they are willing to receive cost-free genetic testing of BRCA 1 and BRCA2.
RESULTS: Ninety-two of 107 (86 %) patients agreed and 15 (14 %) refused. The rate of refusal for BRCA testing was higher in "stronger family history group" (6/24, 25 %) compared to "weaker" (7/50, 14 %) or "sporadic" (2/33, 6 %) (p = 0.04), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the currently available preventive measures and/or counseling system may not be sufficient enough to convince the high risk population to receive the genetic testing or to overcome the prejudice in non-urban area in Japan, even if served free.
METHODS: Of 670 patients seen and detailed family history taken at our hospital, located non-urban, 30 (4 %) gave the family history of breast cancer in more than 2 members within the second degree relatives ("stronger" family history group), 92 (14 %) in 1 member ("weaker" group), and 548 (82 %) in none of members ("sporadic" group). Then, we selected 107 (24 from "stronger", 50 from "weaker", 33 from "sporadic" family history group) to see if they are willing to receive cost-free genetic testing of BRCA 1 and BRCA2.
RESULTS: Ninety-two of 107 (86 %) patients agreed and 15 (14 %) refused. The rate of refusal for BRCA testing was higher in "stronger family history group" (6/24, 25 %) compared to "weaker" (7/50, 14 %) or "sporadic" (2/33, 6 %) (p = 0.04), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the currently available preventive measures and/or counseling system may not be sufficient enough to convince the high risk population to receive the genetic testing or to overcome the prejudice in non-urban area in Japan, even if served free.