MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/rli.0b013e3181f3fcdf

Медицинская библиотека · Investigative radiology · 2011

Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk italian 1 study): final results.

Sardanelli Francesco, Podo Franca, Santoro Filippo, Manoukian Siranoush, Bergonzi Silvana, Trecate Giovanna, Vergnaghi Daniele, Federico Massimo, Cortesi Laura, Corcione Stefano, Morassut Sandro, Di Maggio Cosimo, Cilotti Anna, Martincich Laura, Calabrese Massimo, Zuiani Chiara, Preda Lorenzo, Bonanni Bernardo, Carbonaro Luca A, Contegiacomo Alma, Panizza Pietro, Di Cesare Ernesto, Savarese Antonella, Crecco Marcello, Turchetti Daniela, Tonutti Maura, Belli Paolo, Maschio Alessandro Del, High Breast Cancer Risk Italian 1 (HIBCRIT-1) Study

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

: To prospectively compare clinical breast examination, mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a multicenter surveillance of high-risk women.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

: We enrolled asymptomatic women aged ≥ 25: BRCA mutation carriers; first-degree relatives of BRCA mutation carriers, and women with strong family history of breast/ovarian cancer, including those with previous personal breast cancer.

RESULTS

: A total of 18 centers enrolled 501 women and performed 1592 rounds (3.2 rounds/woman). Forty-nine screen-detected and 3 interval cancers were diagnosed: 44 invasive, 8 ductal carcinoma in situ; only 4 pT2 stage; 32 G3 grade. Of 39 patients explored for nodal status, 28 (72%) were negative. Incidence per year-woman resulted 3.3% overall, 2.1% <50, and 5.4% ≥ 50 years (P < 0.001), 4.3% in women with previous personal breast cancer and 2.5% in those without (P = 0.045). MRI was more sensitive (91%) than clinical breast examination (18%), mammography (50%), ultrasonography (52%), or mammography plus ultrasonography (63%) (P < 0.001). Specificity ranged 96% to 99%, positive predictive value 53% to 71%, positive likelihood ratio 24 to 52 (P not significant). MRI showed significantly better negative predictive value (99.6) and negative likelihood ratio (0.09) than those of the other modalities. At receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under the curve of MRI (0.97) was significantly higher than that of mammography (0.83) or ultrasonography (0.82) and not significantly increased when MRI was combined with mammography and/or ultrasonography. Of 52 cancers, 16 (31%) were diagnosed only by MRI, 8 of 21 (38%) in women <50, and 8 of 31 (26%) in women ≥ 50 years of age.

CONCLUSION

: MRI largely outperformed mammography, ultrasonography, and their combination for screening high-risk women below and over 50.

Для цитирования: Sardanelli Francesco, Podo Franca, Santoro Filippo, Manoukian Siranoush, Bergonzi Silvana, Trecate Giovanna, Vergnaghi Daniele, Federico Massimo, Cortesi Laura, Corcione Stefano, Morassut Sandro, Di Maggio Cosimo, Cilotti Anna, Martincich Laura, Calabrese Massimo, Zuiani Chiara, Preda Lorenzo, Bonanni Bernardo, Carbonaro Luca A, Contegiacomo Alma, Panizza Pietro, Di Cesare Ernesto, Savarese Antonella, Crecco Marcello, Turchetti Daniela, Tonutti Maura, Belli Paolo, Maschio Alessandro Del, High Breast Cancer Risk Italian 1 (HIBCRIT-1) Study. Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk italian 1 study): final results.. Investigative radiology. 2011. DOI: 10.1097/rli.0b013e3181f3fcdf.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.