MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00442.x

Медицинская библиотека · Biometrics · 2006

Case-control and case-only designs with genotype and family history data: estimating relative risk, residual familial aggregation, and cumulative risk.

Chatterjee Nilanjan, Kalaylioglu Zeynep, Shih Joanna H, Gail Mitchell H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In case-control studies of inherited diseases, participating subjects (probands) are often interviewed to collect detailed data about disease history and age-at-onset information in their family members. Genotype data are typically collected from the probands, but not from their relatives. In this article, we introduce an approach that combines case-control analysis of data on the probands with kin-cohort analysis of disease history data on relatives. Assuming a marginally specified multivariate survival model for joint risk of disease among family members, we describe methods for estimating relative risk, cumulative risk, and residual familial aggregation. We also describe a variation of the methodology that can be used for kin-cohort analysis of the family history data from a sample of genotyped cases only. We perform simulation studies to assess performance of the proposed methodologies with correct and mis-specified models for familial aggregation. We illustrate the proposed methodologies by estimating the risk of breast cancer from BRCA1/2 mutations using data from the Washington Ashkenazi Study.

Для цитирования: Chatterjee Nilanjan, Kalaylioglu Zeynep, Shih Joanna H, Gail Mitchell H. Case-control and case-only designs with genotype and family history data: estimating relative risk, residual familial aggregation, and cumulative risk.. Biometrics. 2006. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00442.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.