Clinical efficacy of prostate PI-RADS V2.1 score combined with serum PSA-related indicators in the detection of gray zone prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to improve the diagnostic accuracy of gray zone prostate cancer evaluation by combining the prostate imaging report and data system version 2.1 (PI-RADS V2.1) score with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA).

METHODS

We analyzed data from 212 men suspected of having prostate cancer and compared PSA-related indicators and PI-RADS V2.1 scores between 96 patients with prostate cancer and 116 without prostate cancer. By contrasting PI-RADS V2.1 scores with serum PSA-related markers, the diagnostic precision in the detection of grey zone prostate cancer was assessed.

RESULTS

The median PI-RADS V2.1 scores and serum tPSA levels of patients with prostate cancer were significantly higher (P < 0.05). The PI-RADS V2.1 score correlated positively with serum tPSA, PSA density (PSAD), and prostate health index (PHI) levels (P < 0.05) and negatively correlated with fPSA/tPSA concentrations (P < 0.05). Logistic regression identified risk factors including family history, PI-RADS V2.1 score, tPSA, PSAD, and PHI, with prostate volume and fPSA/tPSA as protective factors (P < 0.05). Combining serum PSA-related indicators with the PI-RADS V2.1 score improved diagnostic accuracy for gray zone prostate cancer (AUC 0.986, specificity 99.14%, sensitivity 92.71%).

CONCLUSION

The presence of a family history, a high PI-RADS V2.1 score, and elevated serum PSA-related markers contribute to high prostate cancer risk and development. The combined use of these indicators offers superior predictive value in detecting prostate cancer compared to a single indicator.