Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026
Diagnostic Accuracy of High-Resolution Manometry for Assessing Fundoplication Integrity: Validation of the Padova Classification.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vittori Arianna, Capovilla Giovanni, Santangelo Matteo, Yadlapati Rena, Gyawali C Prakash, Savarino Edoardo Vincenzo, Provenzano Luca, Forattini Francesca, Pittacolo Matteo, Zuin Irene Sole, Nezi Giulia, Nicoletti Loredana, Valmasoni Michele, Salvador Renato
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Recurrent symptoms after laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) are not fully understood, with ongoing research focusing on their mechanisms. This study aimed to validate the Padova Classification, a postoperative high-resolution manometry (HRM) framework to distinguish functioning from defective fundoplications.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data from consecutive patients who underwent post-LF HRM (2010-2025) were analyzed and categorized as functioning and effective LF (FELF), post-fundoplication outflow obstruction (PFOO), and ineffective neo-barrier (INB). Primary analysis involved between-group comparisons. Padova Classification diagnostic accuracy was evaluated against a composite reference standard (clinical, radiological, endoscopic, and pH-monitoring criteria) by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for each diagnostic category. Diagnostic performance of postoperative integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) for identifying PFOO was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
KEY RESULTS: Among 373 patients (42.4% female; median age 54 years, median BMI 25.9 kg/m2; 55.2% Nissen, 44.8% Toupet), FELF, INB, and PFOO were observed in 58.7%, 21.4%, and 18.0% of patients, respectively, with PFOO most frequently seen with Nissen fundoplication (p = 0.001). The Padova Classification showed sensitivity/specificity 94.7%/97.1% for FELF, 88.8%/96.9% for INB, and 100%/97.4% for PFOO. Postoperative integrated relaxation pressure accurately discriminated PFOO (AUC 0.959-0.984; cutoff 18.1 mmHg; sensitivity 97.7%-98.0%, specificity 93.2%-96.8%), with no difference between ROC curves derived from Padova Classification and reference standard (p = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the Padova Classification demonstrates strong performance in assessing postoperative LF function.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data from consecutive patients who underwent post-LF HRM (2010-2025) were analyzed and categorized as functioning and effective LF (FELF), post-fundoplication outflow obstruction (PFOO), and ineffective neo-barrier (INB). Primary analysis involved between-group comparisons. Padova Classification diagnostic accuracy was evaluated against a composite reference standard (clinical, radiological, endoscopic, and pH-monitoring criteria) by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for each diagnostic category. Diagnostic performance of postoperative integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) for identifying PFOO was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
KEY RESULTS: Among 373 patients (42.4% female; median age 54 years, median BMI 25.9 kg/m2; 55.2% Nissen, 44.8% Toupet), FELF, INB, and PFOO were observed in 58.7%, 21.4%, and 18.0% of patients, respectively, with PFOO most frequently seen with Nissen fundoplication (p = 0.001). The Padova Classification showed sensitivity/specificity 94.7%/97.1% for FELF, 88.8%/96.9% for INB, and 100%/97.4% for PFOO. Postoperative integrated relaxation pressure accurately discriminated PFOO (AUC 0.959-0.984; cutoff 18.1 mmHg; sensitivity 97.7%-98.0%, specificity 93.2%-96.8%), with no difference between ROC curves derived from Padova Classification and reference standard (p = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the Padova Classification demonstrates strong performance in assessing postoperative LF function.