BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026
Predicting of early miscarriage based on machine learning: a retrospective cohort study in China.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cai Jia, Qu Jialin, Chai Tingjia, Zou Hua, Zeng Dachuan, Li Shu, Liao Fanghong, Li Chunli, Li Qian
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Early miscarriage (EM) remains a significant reproductive health challenge, with current serum hormone biomarkers (β-hCG, progesterone, estradiol) showing inconsistent predictive value across studies. To address these limitations, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques are increasingly applied to integrate complex biomarker data and improve the early prediction of EM.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 17,926 singleton pregnancies (1,918 EM vs. 16,008 live births) from Chongqing (2017-2023), China, to establish optimal hormonal predictors and timing for EM risk assessment. Serum hormone concentrations were longitudinally analyzed across distinct gestational weeks to characterize temporal variations. To assess the predictive efficacy of individual biomarkers and composite models, we conducted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. The optimal predictive biomarker and the earliest gestational time point for EM detection were determined through comparative evaluation of area under the ROC curve (AUC) values derived from univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Finally, a systematic machine learning approach employing ten distinct algorithms was implemented to screen and validate the most robust prediction model.
RESULTS: Longitudinal analysis revealed distinct gestational patterns: β-hCG and estradiol showed weekly increases through 9 weeks before stabilizing, while progesterone demonstrated a biphasic pattern (decline until 7 weeks, subsequent rise). EM cases exhibited significantly lower hormone levels across all gestational weeks. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to assess the predictive performance of both univariate and multivariate models, which revealed a progressive increase in accuracy with advancing gestational age (AUC range: 0.67-0.99). Notably, week 4 progesterone alone showed predictive capacity (AUC = 0.67, cut-off = 17.75 pg/ml). Machine learning evaluation of 10 algorithms identified an artificial neural network (ANN) incorporating β-hCG, progesterone, estradiol, and maternal age as optimal, achieving superior prediction accuracy at week 4 (training AUC = 0.82; validation AUC = 0.81). This multivariate model enables EM risk stratification earlier than conventional hormonal assessments.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings resolve key controversies regarding predictive thresholds and timing while demonstrating the clinical potential of machine learning integration for early pregnancy risk assessment. The established week 4 prediction window offers critical opportunities for timely intervention and patient counseling.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 17,926 singleton pregnancies (1,918 EM vs. 16,008 live births) from Chongqing (2017-2023), China, to establish optimal hormonal predictors and timing for EM risk assessment. Serum hormone concentrations were longitudinally analyzed across distinct gestational weeks to characterize temporal variations. To assess the predictive efficacy of individual biomarkers and composite models, we conducted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. The optimal predictive biomarker and the earliest gestational time point for EM detection were determined through comparative evaluation of area under the ROC curve (AUC) values derived from univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Finally, a systematic machine learning approach employing ten distinct algorithms was implemented to screen and validate the most robust prediction model.
RESULTS: Longitudinal analysis revealed distinct gestational patterns: β-hCG and estradiol showed weekly increases through 9 weeks before stabilizing, while progesterone demonstrated a biphasic pattern (decline until 7 weeks, subsequent rise). EM cases exhibited significantly lower hormone levels across all gestational weeks. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to assess the predictive performance of both univariate and multivariate models, which revealed a progressive increase in accuracy with advancing gestational age (AUC range: 0.67-0.99). Notably, week 4 progesterone alone showed predictive capacity (AUC = 0.67, cut-off = 17.75 pg/ml). Machine learning evaluation of 10 algorithms identified an artificial neural network (ANN) incorporating β-hCG, progesterone, estradiol, and maternal age as optimal, achieving superior prediction accuracy at week 4 (training AUC = 0.82; validation AUC = 0.81). This multivariate model enables EM risk stratification earlier than conventional hormonal assessments.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings resolve key controversies regarding predictive thresholds and timing while demonstrating the clinical potential of machine learning integration for early pregnancy risk assessment. The established week 4 prediction window offers critical opportunities for timely intervention and patient counseling.