Surgical endoscopy · 2026
Clip-first emergency hemostasis for acute esophagogastric variceal bleeding: a retrospective comparative study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cui Yurong, Li Jinxin, Zhao Bing, Cai Mengqiang, Wu Kanglin, Liu Wei, Liu Junying
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Active esophagogastric variceal bleeding can obscure the endoscopic field and make definitive therapy difficult during emergency gastroscopy. We evaluated a clip-first strategy designed to obtain immediate mechanical control before local cyanoacrylate reinforcement or staged secondary prophylaxis.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 115 acute bleeding episodes among 102 adults treated at a single tertiary center. Episodes were assigned to a clip-first group (n = 42) or a conventional emergency endoscopic therapy group without clip-first control (n = 73). Variceal anatomy was reclassified as esophageal varices (EV) only or by the Sarin system for gastric varices. Primary outcomes were technical success and endoscopic hemostasis time; secondary outcomes included injection material use, rebleeding, adverse events, length of stay, and mortality.
RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all episodes. Hemostasis time was shorter in the unadjusted analysis (10.60 ± 5.14 vs. 12.84 ± 6.66 min; P = 0.049), but the adjusted difference was not statistically significant (- 1.96 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.17 to 0.25; P = 0.081). Adjusted reductions in cyanoacrylate (- 0.79 mL, 95% CI -1.15 to -0.44; P < 0.001) and lauromacrogol (- 4.10 mL, 95% CI -6.82 to -1.37; P = 0.004) remained significant. No perforation, ectopic embolism, local tissue necrosis, or death was recorded among patients with documented status.
CONCLUSIONS: Clip-first emergency hemostasis was feasible, with no significant difference in adjusted hemostasis time and with reduced cyanoacrylate and lauromacrogol use. Larger prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the clinical significance of this strategy, including its effects on hemostatic efficiency, and rebleeding.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 115 acute bleeding episodes among 102 adults treated at a single tertiary center. Episodes were assigned to a clip-first group (n = 42) or a conventional emergency endoscopic therapy group without clip-first control (n = 73). Variceal anatomy was reclassified as esophageal varices (EV) only or by the Sarin system for gastric varices. Primary outcomes were technical success and endoscopic hemostasis time; secondary outcomes included injection material use, rebleeding, adverse events, length of stay, and mortality.
RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all episodes. Hemostasis time was shorter in the unadjusted analysis (10.60 ± 5.14 vs. 12.84 ± 6.66 min; P = 0.049), but the adjusted difference was not statistically significant (- 1.96 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.17 to 0.25; P = 0.081). Adjusted reductions in cyanoacrylate (- 0.79 mL, 95% CI -1.15 to -0.44; P < 0.001) and lauromacrogol (- 4.10 mL, 95% CI -6.82 to -1.37; P = 0.004) remained significant. No perforation, ectopic embolism, local tissue necrosis, or death was recorded among patients with documented status.
CONCLUSIONS: Clip-first emergency hemostasis was feasible, with no significant difference in adjusted hemostasis time and with reduced cyanoacrylate and lauromacrogol use. Larger prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the clinical significance of this strategy, including its effects on hemostatic efficiency, and rebleeding.