Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin · 2026
Sex Differences in Sentiment-Scored Vocabulary Patterns in VAERS Free-Text Narratives of Four Major Vaccine Categories.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Matsumura Kae, Horibe Megumi, Ino Yoko, Sugishita Kana, Yamazaki Tomofumi, Maeno Moe, Kageyama Koichi, Ito Seiichiro, Sato Mugita, Chikahisa Mahiro, Kitamura Mayumi, Iwata Mari, Iguchi Kazuhiro, Nakamura Mitsuhiro
Аннотация
Free-text narratives in vaccine adverse event reports contain symptom descriptions and contextual wording that can be characterized using text mining. However, lexicon-based sentiment scores in medical narratives should be interpreted as vocabulary patterns rather than direct measures of patients' emotional states. We evaluated sex-specific and vaccine-specific patterns in sentiment-scored and emotion-category assignment vocabulary in Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) narratives for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), influenza, human papillomavirus (HPV), and measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccines. Public VAERS reports received from 2010 to 2024 were analyzed. VAERSDATA, VAERSVAX, and VAERSSYMPTOMS were linked by VAERS_ID, with duplicate records removed. Report-level AFINN scores were normalized per 100 words. Sensitivity analyses excluded common clinical and symptom-related terms. Effect sizes, 95% confidence intervals, adjusted linear regression models with HC3 robust standard errors, and NRC emotion-category assignment profiles were evaluated. After duplicate handling, 1022460 COVID-19, 148489 influenza, 41212 HPV, and 47459 MMR reports were analyzed. Female-associated reports generally showed slightly lower primary AFINN scores than male-associated reports, although effect sizes were negligible. Excluding clinical and symptom-related terms attenuated or reversed these differences. Adjusted regression models showed only small associations between sex and AFINN scores. NRC analyses demonstrated clearer vaccine-specific than sex-specific vocabulary patterns. VAERS narratives showed only small sex-related differences but distinct vaccine-specific patterns in sentiment-scored and emotion-category assignment vocabulary. These findings should be interpreted as lexicon-derived vocabulary patterns rather than direct measures of psychological responses, vaccine perceptions, or clinical outcomes.