Maternal and child health journal · 2006
Prenatal screening for substance use and violence: findings from physician focus groups.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Taylor Polly, Zaichkin Jeanette, Pilkey Diane, Leconte Judith, Johnson Bryan K, Peterson Anne C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To guide quality improvement activities, the study sought to identify effective strategies for influencing and improving physician screening and referral of pregnant women for violence and substance abuse (alcohol, drugs and tobacco).
METHODS: This qualitative study conducted in Washington State consisted of interviews with eight physicians and focus groups with twenty-eight physicians who practice obstetric care. Physicians, selected using systematic sampling, were asked about perceptions on the importance of screening and barriers to effective screening, awareness of information and resources from the state Department of Health, and the effectiveness of various provider training strategies for improving prenatal screening.
RESULTS: Physicians were most interested in practical, concise information for themselves and office staff. Referral information and patient handouts were identified as important tools to increase the efficacy of screening and intervention. Physicians supported in-person programs in offices or in hospitals but rejected use of audio conferences and direct mailings.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provided insight about the way we deliver best practice information to physicians. Collecting qualitative data from physicians is important prior to developing statewide quality improvement activities aimed at this group.
METHODS: This qualitative study conducted in Washington State consisted of interviews with eight physicians and focus groups with twenty-eight physicians who practice obstetric care. Physicians, selected using systematic sampling, were asked about perceptions on the importance of screening and barriers to effective screening, awareness of information and resources from the state Department of Health, and the effectiveness of various provider training strategies for improving prenatal screening.
RESULTS: Physicians were most interested in practical, concise information for themselves and office staff. Referral information and patient handouts were identified as important tools to increase the efficacy of screening and intervention. Physicians supported in-person programs in offices or in hospitals but rejected use of audio conferences and direct mailings.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provided insight about the way we deliver best practice information to physicians. Collecting qualitative data from physicians is important prior to developing statewide quality improvement activities aimed at this group.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Attitude of Health PersonnelBenchmarkingDomestic ViolenceFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMass ScreeningMedical History TakingPatient Education as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'PregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareQualitative ResearchQuality Assurance, Health CareRisk-TakingSubstance-Related DisordersWashington