Journal of medical genetics · 2019
RASA1 mosaic mutations in patients with capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Revencu Nicole, Fastre Elodie, Ravoet Marie, Helaers Raphaël, Brouillard Pascal, Bisdorff-Bresson Annouk, Chung Clara W T, Gerard Marion, Dvorakova Veronika, Irvine Alan D, Boon Laurence M, Vikkula Miikka
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation is an autosomal dominant disorder, characterised by capillary malformations and increased risk of fast-flow vascular malformations, caused by loss-of-function mutations in the RASA1 or EPHB4 genes. Around 25% of the patients do not seem to carry a germline mutation in either one of these two genes. Even if other genes could be involved, some individuals may have mutations in the known genes that escaped detection by less sensitive techniques. We tested the hypothesis that mosaic mutations could explain some of previously negative cases.
METHODS: DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes, saliva or vascular malformation tissues from four patients. RASA1 and EPHB4 coding regions and exon/intron boundaries were analysed by targeted custom gene panel sequencing. A second panel and/or Sanger sequencing were used to confirm the identified mutations.
RESULTS: Four distinct mosaic RASA1 mutations, with an allele frequency ranging from 3% to 25%, were identified in four index patients with classical capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation phenotype. Three mutations were known, one was novel. In one patient, a somatic second hit was also identified. One index case had three affected children, illustrating that the mosaicism was also present in the germline.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that RASA1 mosaic mutations can cause capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation. Thus, highly sensitive sequencing techniques should be considered as diagnostic tools, especially for patients with no family history. Even low-level mosaicism can cause the classical phenotype and increased risk for offspring. In addition, our study further supports the second-hit pathophysiological mechanism to explain the multifocality of vascular lesions in this disorder.
METHODS: DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes, saliva or vascular malformation tissues from four patients. RASA1 and EPHB4 coding regions and exon/intron boundaries were analysed by targeted custom gene panel sequencing. A second panel and/or Sanger sequencing were used to confirm the identified mutations.
RESULTS: Four distinct mosaic RASA1 mutations, with an allele frequency ranging from 3% to 25%, were identified in four index patients with classical capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation phenotype. Three mutations were known, one was novel. In one patient, a somatic second hit was also identified. One index case had three affected children, illustrating that the mosaicism was also present in the germline.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that RASA1 mosaic mutations can cause capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation. Thus, highly sensitive sequencing techniques should be considered as diagnostic tools, especially for patients with no family history. Even low-level mosaicism can cause the classical phenotype and increased risk for offspring. In addition, our study further supports the second-hit pathophysiological mechanism to explain the multifocality of vascular lesions in this disorder.