MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0956462416680765

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of STD & AIDS · 2016

Rates of sexual history taking and screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men.

MacRae Alasdair, Lord Emily, Forsythe Annabel, Sherrard Jackie

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A case note audit was undertaken of HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) to ascertain whether national guidelines for taking sexual histories, including recreational drug use and sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening were being met. The notes of 142 HIV-positive men seen in 2015 were available, of whom 85 were MSM. Information was collected regarding sexual history, recreational drug use documentation, sexually transmitted infection screen offer and test results. Seventy-seven (91%) of the MSM had a sexual history documented, of whom 60 (78%) were sexually active. STI screens were offered to 58/60 (97%) of those who were sexually active and accepted by 53 (91%). Twelve (23%) of these had an STI. A recreational drug history was taken in 63 (74%) with 17 (27%) reporting use and 3 (5%) chemsex. The high rate of STIs highlights that regular screening in this group is essential. Additionally, the fact that over a quarter reported recreational drug use and given the increasing concern around chemsex, questions about this should be incorporated into the sexual history proforma.

Для цитирования: MacRae Alasdair, Lord Emily, Forsythe Annabel, Sherrard Jackie. Rates of sexual history taking and screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men.. International journal of STD & AIDS. 2016. DOI: 10.1177/0956462416680765.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.