The Australian journal of rural health · 2023
The 'hot zone policy' for colorectal cancer screening presents unique risks and opportunities for rural Australia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Worthington Joachim, Lew Jie-Bin, He Emily, Broun Kate, D'Onise Katina, Grogan Paul, Canfell Karen, Feletto Eleonora
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer has geographic inequities in Australia, with higher mortality rates and lower participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) in remote and rural areas. The at-home kit is temperature-sensitive, necessitating a 'hot zone policy' (HZP); kits are not sent when an area's average monthly temperature is above 30°C. Australians in HZP areas are susceptible to potential screening disruptions but may benefit from well-timed interventions to improve participation. This study describes the demographics of HZP areas and estimates the impacts of potential screening changes.
METHODS: The number of individuals in HZP areas was estimated, as well as correlations with remoteness, socio-economic and Indigenous status. The potential impacts of screening changes were estimated.
RESULTS: Over a million eligible Australians live in HZP areas, which are more likely to be remote/rural, have lower socio-economic status and higher Indigenous populations. Predictive modelling estimates that any 3-month screening disruption would increase CRC mortality rates up to 4.1 times more in HZP areas vs unaffected areas, while targeted intervention could decrease mortality rates 3.4 times more in HZP areas.
CONCLUSION: People living in affected areas would be negatively impacted by any NBCSP disruption, compounding existing inequities. However, well-timed health promotion could have a stronger impact.
METHODS: The number of individuals in HZP areas was estimated, as well as correlations with remoteness, socio-economic and Indigenous status. The potential impacts of screening changes were estimated.
RESULTS: Over a million eligible Australians live in HZP areas, which are more likely to be remote/rural, have lower socio-economic status and higher Indigenous populations. Predictive modelling estimates that any 3-month screening disruption would increase CRC mortality rates up to 4.1 times more in HZP areas vs unaffected areas, while targeted intervention could decrease mortality rates 3.4 times more in HZP areas.
CONCLUSION: People living in affected areas would be negatively impacted by any NBCSP disruption, compounding existing inequities. However, well-timed health promotion could have a stronger impact.