Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2009
Acetazolamide influences ocular pulse amplitude.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zinkernagel Martin S, Ebneter Andreas
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of systemic acetazolamide on ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) and on intraocular pressure (IOP).
METHODS: We determined OPA, IOP, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate (HR) in 17 patients suffering from hypertensive primary open-angle glaucoma (htPOAG) and 22 healthy controls. Measurements were taken before and 2 h after oral intake of 500 mg of acetazolamide.
RESULTS: Mean OPA decreased 20.24% (SEM 2.95%) from 2.76 mmHg (SEM 0.16 mmHg) to 2.14 mmHg (SEM 0.13 mmHg) 2 h after oral administration of 500-mg acetazolamide. IOP dropped by 2.98 mmHg (SEM 0.28 mmHg), corresponding to a 17.19% (SEM 1.56%) reduction. The decrease in IOP correlated with the decrease of OPA (r(2) = 0.4, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Ocular pulse amplitude measurements are influenced by oral administration of acetazolamide. There was a decrease in the pulsatile component of choroidal blood flow and in IOP in both htPOAG and healthy controls. This needs to be taken into account for measurement of OPA with dynamic contour tonometry.
METHODS: We determined OPA, IOP, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate (HR) in 17 patients suffering from hypertensive primary open-angle glaucoma (htPOAG) and 22 healthy controls. Measurements were taken before and 2 h after oral intake of 500 mg of acetazolamide.
RESULTS: Mean OPA decreased 20.24% (SEM 2.95%) from 2.76 mmHg (SEM 0.16 mmHg) to 2.14 mmHg (SEM 0.13 mmHg) 2 h after oral administration of 500-mg acetazolamide. IOP dropped by 2.98 mmHg (SEM 0.28 mmHg), corresponding to a 17.19% (SEM 1.56%) reduction. The decrease in IOP correlated with the decrease of OPA (r(2) = 0.4, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Ocular pulse amplitude measurements are influenced by oral administration of acetazolamide. There was a decrease in the pulsatile component of choroidal blood flow and in IOP in both htPOAG and healthy controls. This needs to be taken into account for measurement of OPA with dynamic contour tonometry.