Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2013
Evaluation of misdiagnosed cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage and causal factors for misdiagnosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamada Tetsuhisa, Natori Yoshihiro
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis has a major impact on the outcome of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). We studied patients with SAH who were admitted to our hospital in an effort to identify ways to prevent misdiagnosis.
METHODS: A total of 494 patients with SAH were admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery from 2003 through 2010. Misdiagnosis occurred in 30 patients (6.1%). We studied the symptoms and the types of misdiagnoses in these 30 patients.
RESULTS: Misdiagnosis occurred 37 times in the 30 patients (6 patients were given more than 1 misdiagnosis). There were 3 types of misdiagnoses. Type 1 cases were misdiagnosed as a common cold, type 2 cases were misdiagnosed as circulatory organ disease, and type 3 cases were misdiagnosed as digestive organ disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Type 1 cases were mild, and diagnosis required detailed medical history analyses. Type 2 cases were severe and were diagnosed based on electrocardiographic and echocardiographic changes characteristic of SAH. Symptoms of type 3 cases included vomiting, and diagnosis required recognition of meningeal irritation syndrome and detailed medical history analyses.
METHODS: A total of 494 patients with SAH were admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery from 2003 through 2010. Misdiagnosis occurred in 30 patients (6.1%). We studied the symptoms and the types of misdiagnoses in these 30 patients.
RESULTS: Misdiagnosis occurred 37 times in the 30 patients (6 patients were given more than 1 misdiagnosis). There were 3 types of misdiagnoses. Type 1 cases were misdiagnosed as a common cold, type 2 cases were misdiagnosed as circulatory organ disease, and type 3 cases were misdiagnosed as digestive organ disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Type 1 cases were mild, and diagnosis required detailed medical history analyses. Type 2 cases were severe and were diagnosed based on electrocardiographic and echocardiographic changes characteristic of SAH. Symptoms of type 3 cases included vomiting, and diagnosis required recognition of meningeal irritation syndrome and detailed medical history analyses.