MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/fampra/cmr026

Медицинская библиотека · Family practice · 2011

Validity of self-reported colorectal cancer test use in different racial/ethnic groups.

Shokar Navkiran K, Vernon Sally W, Carlson Carol A

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Prevalence of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is ascertained by self-reported screening, yet little is known about the accuracy of this method across different racial/ethnic groups, particularly Hispanics. The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of CRC self-report measures across three racial/ethnic groups.

METHODS

During 2004 and 2005, 271 white, African-American and Hispanic participants were recruited from a primary care clinic in Southeast Texas, and their CRC testing history based on self-report and medical record (the 'gold standard') were compared.

RESULTS

Over-reporting was prevalent. Overall, up-to-date CRC test use was 57.6% by self-report and 43.9% by medical record. Racial/ethnic group differences were most pronounced for Hispanics in whom sensitivity was significantly lower for any up-to-date testing, fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema. There were no statistically significant differences across groups for over-reporting, specificity or concordance.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-report prevalence data are overestimating CRC test use in all groups; current measures are less sensitive in Hispanics.

Для цитирования: Shokar Navkiran K, Vernon Sally W, Carlson Carol A. Validity of self-reported colorectal cancer test use in different racial/ethnic groups.. Family practice. 2011. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmr026.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.