MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.03.045

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric surgery · 2007

Stability of prevalence rates of anorectal malformations in the Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System 1990-2004.

Lowry R Brian, Sibbald Barbara, Bedard Tanya

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Anorectal malformations appeared to be increasing in the province of Alberta, Canada. To assess whether this was a significant trend, with the possibility of these having a teratogenic origin, we examined the frequency of anorectal malformations over a 15-year period.

METHODS

We examined the records of the Alberta Congenital Anomaly Surveillance System, which is a semiactive surveillance system using the British Paediatric Association and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health expansions of the International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision and the International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision.

RESULTS

The overall rate was 1/2162 (4.63/10,000 total births) with a marked male predominance (1.7:1). Approximately two thirds of the 273 cases had 1 or more malformations.

CONCLUSION

Although there was an increasing trend in the rate from 1999 especially for the multiples, this was not significant. In view of the advances in syndrome identification and molecular diagnostics, consideration should be given to a detailed review of the family history and appropriate testing not only for multiple cases but also for isolated ones.

Для цитирования: Lowry R Brian, Sibbald Barbara, Bedard Tanya. Stability of prevalence rates of anorectal malformations in the Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System 1990-2004.. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.03.045.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.