MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-2006-933430

Медицинская библиотека · Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie · 2006

[Gynecological outpatient management in HNPCC].

Bach K, Preyer J, Jensen A, Epplen J T, Kunstmann E

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Female patients with diagnosis of endometrial or ovarian cancer before the age of 45 are suspicious of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). In the daily routine it is difficult to distinguish between HNPCC and sporadic cancer, however, the consequences are severe. A standardised interview was conducted to evaluate the management of HNPCC-patients in medical practice. COHORT AND

METHODS

36 gynecologists working in medical practice were interviewed, statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 12.0.

RESULTS

Most of the gynecologists refer to a hereditary tumor syndrome in consideration of family history, diagnosis at early age and synchronous or metachronous cancer. Patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer before the age of 45 years were rated as high risk patients. 72 % of the gynecologists take care of female patients suspicious of HNPCC according to the Bethesda criteria, even though half of these do not consider that diagnosis. Gynecological surveillance examinations are not fully taken into account. The interdisciplinary surveillance concept is rarely initiated.

CONCLUSION

The current surveillance recommendation for patients suspicious of HNPCC should be applied more often in the daily routine of gynecological outpatient management. Sponsored by Deutsche Krebshilfe.

Для цитирования: Bach K, Preyer J, Jensen A, Epplen J T, Kunstmann E. [Gynecological outpatient management in HNPCC].. Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie. 2006. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-933430.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.